skills.rest
ImpactMojo
ImpactMojoOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
Website𝕏@impactmojoGitHub

fact-check

Identify and correct factual inaccuracies in ImpactMojo content with a structured report.

2|1|Updated Jul 26, 2025
Search Tags:#quality-assurance#content-management#fact-check#content-audit#editorial-review#factual-accuracy
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ImpactMojo/ImpactMojo --skill fact-check-impactmojo
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: fact-check
Source: https://github.com/ImpactMojo/ImpactMojo/tree/main/.claude/skills/fact-check
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ImpactMojo/ImpactMojo --skill fact-check-impactmojo

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Fact-check content across the ImpactMojo platform to ensure factual accuracy in blog posts, courses, labs, games, and book summaries.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Inventory content and identify factual discrepancies (dates, attributions, statistics, and sources).
  • Flag hard errors for remediation and soft issues for hedged language; provide corrective notes and citation suggestions.
  • Generate a compliance report and cross-link related materials to support a content audit workflow.

Quick Start

Run this skill to audit the latest content and flag factual errors for remediation.

Frequently Asked Questions about fact-check

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit content for factual accuracy before publishing blog posts?▼

To audit content for factual accuracy, run a structured check against dates, attributions, statistics, and source citations. This process flags hard errors requiring remediation and soft issues needing hedged language, outputting a compliance report for pre-launch review.

What is the best way to fact-check dates, attributions, and statistics in course materials?▼

Fact-checking course materials involves inventorying content to identify factual discrepancies across dates, attributions, and statistics. It enforces structured source citation checks and generates corrective notes specifically tailored for high-risk flagship courses.

Can I flag soft issues and hard factual errors separately during a content audit?▼

Yes, a content audit can separate hard factual errors from soft issues by flagging hard errors for immediate remediation and soft issues for hedged language adjustments. The system outputs a report distinguishing these categories alongside suggested corrective notes.

Does the fact-check process work for book summaries, labs, and games?▼

The fact-check process works across book summaries, labs, and games by inventorying these materials and identifying factual discrepancies. It applies structured checks for dates, attributions, statistics, and sources to ensure platform-wide editorial consistency.

When should I perform an editorial review for factual discrepancies?▼

An editorial review for factual discrepancies should be performed during content inventory, ongoing audits, and pre-launch reviews. Prioritize reviewing high-risk public-facing items like blog posts and flagship courses to enforce strict source citation compliance.

Related Skills

Explore More Content & Communication Skills→
artreimusartreimus

blog-factuality-review

Audit Ylang Labs blog drafts for factual accuracy and MDX compliance.

Community
Advanced
BellaBeBellaBe
37

constraint-action

Identify and classify constraints as hard, soft, or unknown into guardrails.

Community
Advanced
greyhaven-aigreyhaven-ai
29

grey-haven-code-quality-analysis

Identify code quality issues across files for security reviews and audits.

Community
Basic
analystacademyanalystacademy
35

factcheck

Extract factual claims from drafts and verify them against web sources.

Community
Advanced