fix-pr-review

To reconcile conflicting pull request comments, you can deduplicate overlapping findings from multiple reviewers, validate them against the full diff, and apply a consistent set of code changes. This ensures your open PR is updated end-to-end with validated fixes.

The best way to apply fixes from multiple reviewers is to build a unified findings table that deduplicates overlapping claims while preserving sources. You then validate these findings against the PRD and full diff before editing to ensure consistent changes.

Yes, you can push back on code review findings that are wrong, would regress behavior, violate architecture or ADR rules, or expand scope. This calibrated pushback gate ensures only valid and compliant changes are applied to the branch.

To verify code review fixes pass tests before pushing, you should apply the changes using TDD where appropriate and run build, test, and lint verification gates. After passing these checks, you can safely commit and push the updated branch.

Yes, you need your previous pr-review output present in the conversation context to merge external review fixes effectively. The process reconciles external comments with your prior findings to create a comprehensive and validated set of changes.

If external code reviews contain overlapping findings, you should deduplicate the claims while preserving their sources and evidence. This creates a unified findings table with verdicts that can be checked against PRD and ADR constraints before editing.