skills.rest
raydocs
raydocsCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

flow-impl-review

Review code diffs for quality, security, and architecture.

Updated Jan 22, 2026
Search Tags:#architecture#code-review#pull-request#security-review#carmack#flowctl#rp-backend
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/raydocs/antiflowskills --skill flow-impl-review-raydocs
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: flow-impl-review
Source: https://github.com/raydocs/antiflowskills/tree/main/.factory/skills/flow-impl-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/raydocs/antiflowskills --skill flow-impl-review-raydocs

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill enables a rigorous, Carmack-level review of code implementations, coordinating with RepoPrompt backends to ensure changes meet high standards for correctness, simplicity, edge handling, and security before integration.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • John Carmack-level evaluation of implementation changes for correctness, simplicity, edge cases, and security
  • Workflow orchestration with RepoPrompt RP backend to review only changed files and guide verification
  • Ideal for pull requests, feature branches, or commits where automated guidance and structured feedback are needed

Quick Start

Trigger a Carmack-level implementation review on the current branch to assess correctness, edge cases, security, and maintainability.

Frequently Asked Questions about flow-impl-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a Carmack-level code review on a pull request?▼

A Carmack-level code review evaluates implementation changes in a pull request by analyzing the diff between a base commit and HEAD. It assesses correctness, simplicity, edge cases, and security before returning a structured verdict.

Can I review only changed files in a feature branch commit?▼

Reviewing only changed files in a feature branch works by focusing strictly on the diff between a base commit and HEAD. If no base is provided, it evaluates the full branch and ensures only modified code is flagged.

What does an automated architecture and security review check for?▼

An automated architecture and security review checks code implementations for correctness, simplicity, edge case handling, and security vulnerabilities. It applies strict criteria to changed files and returns a verdict to guide automated fixes.

How do I get structured feedback to guide automated fixes for a code diff?▼

To get structured feedback to guide automated fixes, run a strict implementation review on your code diff. The review evaluates quality, security, and architecture, returning a structured verdict that downstream tools can use.

Does the RepoPrompt RP backend support reviewing full branches when no base commit is provided?▼

The RepoPrompt RP backend supports reviewing full branches when no base commit is provided. The workflow orchestrates the review to evaluate changes across the entire branch and flags only the modified code.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
ksciuskscius
2

differential-review

Identify security-relevant changes in git diffs and generate a structured review report.

Community
Intermediate
humansyshumansys
71

rai-quality-review

Audit changed story files for semantic bugs, type honesty, and test quality.

Official
Advanced
gmickelgmickel
674

flow-plan-review

Coordinate RepoPrompt and rp-cli to review implementation plans and architecture docs.

Community
Advanced
0xUrsanomics0xUrsanomics
2

code-review

Review scripts and infrastructure for security vulnerabilities and correctness issues.

Community
Advanced