fresh-eyes-review

Review changed files for security vulnerabilities, logic errors, and business-rule bugs before commits.

90|6|Updated Oct 15, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/2389-research/claude-plugins --skill fresh-eyes-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: fresh-eyes-review
Source: https://github.com/2389-research/claude-plugins/tree/main/fresh-eyes-review/skills
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/2389-research/claude-plugins --skill fresh-eyes-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill acts as a mandatory final sanity check before git commits, PR creation, or declaring work done. It ensures security vulnerabilities, logic errors, and business-rule inconsistencies are surfaced after implementation, tests, and peer review.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Final quality gate: Re-reads touched files to catch issues that slip past automated tests.
  • Security and correctness focus: Checks for common vulnerabilities and logical defects before release.
  • Use Case: Before merging a feature branch, run fresh-eyes-review to surface potential issues and provide a concise remediation list.

Quick Start

Run fresh-eyes-review on the changed files in your branch to surface issues before committing.

Frequently Asked Questions about fresh-eyes-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a final security and bug check before a pull request?

A final sanity check before release identifies and discloses security vulnerabilities, logic errors, and business-rule bugs that slip past automated tests and peer review. It enforces a structured checklist for security, correctness, and business rules.

How do I catch business-rule bugs and logic errors before committing code?

To catch business-rule bugs and logic errors before committing, re-read touched files using a structured checklist. This surfaces logical defects and inconsistencies after implementation, ensuring correctness before a git commit.

Do I need special tooling to perform a release check on changed files?

You do not need special tooling to perform a release check on changed files. The review requires only the project context and enforces a structured checklist for security and correctness without additional dependencies.

What is the best way to surface security vulnerabilities missed by automated tests?

The best way to surface security vulnerabilities missed by automated tests is applying a fresh-eyes review after implementation. It re-reads touched files to catch common vulnerabilities and logical defects before a release declaration.

When should I use a manual code review checklist instead of automated tests?

You should use a manual code review checklist instead of automated tests when you need a final quality gate before a PR. It catches business-rule inconsistencies and security vulnerabilities that automated testing logic often misses.