ftm-codex-gate

Validate code changes with Codex adversarial prompts from INTENT.md and STYLE.md.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/kkudumu/feed-the-machine --skill ftm-codex-gate
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ftm-codex-gate
Source: https://github.com/kkudumu/feed-the-machine/tree/main/ftm-codex-gate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kkudumu/feed-the-machine --skill ftm-codex-gate

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Automates formal adversarial validation of code changes by coordinating Codex prompts and ftm-executor gates to enforce quality and standards at wave boundaries or task completion.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Builds adversarial validation prompts from project INTENT.md and STYLE.md.
  • Executes Codex CLI validations and collects structured results.
  • Emits events like review_complete, issue_found, and task_completed back to the framework for automation.
  • Integrates with the blackboard so context persists across conversations and waves.

Quick Start

Invoke the gate on a task to validate code against intent and style rules.

Frequently Asked Questions about ftm-codex-gate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate adversarial code validation for AI-assisted changes?

Adversarial code validation is automated by coordinating Codex CLI prompts and executor gates to enforce quality and standards at wave boundaries or single-task completion. This Skill builds validation prompts from project rules and returns structured results.

What is an adversarial code review gate and when do I need it?

An adversarial code review gate is an automated quality checkpoint that validates code changes against project intent and style rules. You need it at wave boundaries or task completion to catch issues before merging AI-assisted code.

How do I enforce code style and intent rules using Codex?

Codex enforces code style and intent by executing validation prompts derived from project INTENT.md and STYLE.md files. The gate operates at task boundaries, running the Codex CLI to validate changes and collect structured results.

Can I integrate automated code review events into my existing workflow?

Automated code review events integrate into your workflow by emitting structured signals like review_complete, issue_found, and task_completed back to the calling framework. Context persists across conversations and waves via blackboard integration.

Do I need INTENT.md and STYLE.md files to use automated code validation?

INTENT.md and STYLE.md files are required to build the adversarial validation prompts that enforce project-specific quality gates. The validation process relies on these files to define the intent and style rules for the Codex CLI.

What are the limitations of using Codex as an adversarial validator?

Using Codex as an adversarial validator is limited to enforcing standards defined in your INTENT.md and STYLE.md files. It operates at wave or single-task boundaries and requires integration with ftm-executor to return structured validation results.