Identify and classify gaps and risks in targets by adversarial testing from a specified perspective.
npx skills add https://github.com/Brownbull/gabe-suite --skill gabe-roast
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: gabe-roast Source: https://github.com/Brownbull/gabe-suite/tree/main/skills/gabe-roast Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Brownbull/gabe-suite --skill gabe-roast
Adversarial gap review from a chosen perspective helps teams surface concrete gaps, risks, and missing pieces in designs or plans by forcing a critical, perspective-driven critique.
Provide a target (file, plan, or concept) and a perspective (e.g., Architect) to generate a full roast.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Adversarial gap review identifies risks in an architecture proposal by applying a critical, perspective-driven critique. It forces a specified viewpoint, such as an Architect, to surface concrete missing pieces and classify them by maturity and importance for structured risk assessment.
Adversarial gap review is a perspective-driven critique technique needed during pre-implementation reviews and design critiques. It works by applying a specified viewpoint to a target file, plan, or concept to surface concrete gaps, risks, and missing pieces through critical testing.
Yes, you can review a plan from multiple perspectives sequentially to achieve a 360-degree risk assessment. By providing a target and changing the specified perspective for each run, you generate structured gap outputs covering different viewpoints.
Missing pieces are classified by maturity and importance through an adversarial testing process that outputs organized gaps. Maturity levels include MVP, Enterprise, and Scale, while importance levels range from Critical and High to Medium and Low for structured prioritization.
A perspective-driven gap review generates structured outputs containing a Gap ID, a One-liner description, Effort, Lose, and an optional Fix. These organized gaps provide a clear classification of risks by maturity and importance for the target file or concept.
Yes, adversarial gap review works for files, plans, architectures, or concepts. It requires providing a target and a specified perspective to execute the adversarial testing and identify gaps, making it suitable for diverse design critiques and pre-implementation reviews.
zivtechReviews code, plans, and analysis using a structured multi-perspective protocol with evidence-backed findings.
tyevansReview proposals and plans to identify flaws, gaps, and risks.
williamzujkowskiAssess zero-trust maturity against CISA ZTMM and generate a gap-and-roadmap report.
aniruddh2003Run static analysis tools to detect security vulnerabilities, type errors, and linting issues.
