What problem does it solve?
Researchers need to uncover systemic weaknesses across many evaluated papers to define open problems, but manually reviewing each paper is time‑consuming and error‑prone.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Aggregate evaluations from project memory JSONL records, summarising weakness counts and paper details.
- Semantic clustering of identified weaknesses into meaningful gap categories, highlighting recurring limitations.
- Automated verification of candidate gaps via literature search and cross‑reference with the researcher’s Hamming list.
- Research direction synthesis that proposes concrete problems, cites motivating papers, and flags items for human judgment.
- Persisted reporting of gap analysis results back into the project’s JSONL store.
Use case: After running a literature‑survey that produces 50 evaluation records, invoke this skill to automatically generate a structured gap report that powers the next significance‑screening step.
Quick Start
Ask the gap-analysis skill to synthesize research gaps from the latest literature survey.