gap-running-destruction

Stress-test hypothesis registers by forcing adversarial validation and exposing hidden failure modes.

37|5|Updated Nov 18, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/BellaBe/strategy-os --skill gap-running-destruction
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gap-running-destruction
Source: https://github.com/BellaBe/strategy-os/tree/main/.claude/skills/gap-running-destruction
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/BellaBe/strategy-os --skill gap-running-destruction

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps teams rigorously challenge hypothesis registers by performing structured destruction, red-team responses, and constraint inversions to reveal gaps, blind spots, and kill signals before execution.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Pre-mortem scenario planning: simulate 12-month failure cascades.
  • Red-team response modeling: anticipate incumbent counteractions and their impact on the plan.
  • Constraint inversions & evidence audit: systematically flip assumptions and trace consequences.
  • Contradiction detection: surface mismatches between claims, evidence, and kill conditions.
  • Gap-enforcement readiness: produce actionable insights for decision gating.

Quick Start

Run a destruction pass against the current hypothesis register and document a traceable 12-month failure chain.

Frequently Asked Questions about gap-running-destruction

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I stress-test a hypothesis register before execution?

Adversarially validate a hypothesis register by forcing red-team responses and constraint inversions to expose hidden failure modes and link findings to specific assumptions.

What is the best way to simulate failure cascades in pre-mortem planning?

Simulate failure cascades in pre-mortem planning by modeling 12-month failure chains and mapping incumbent counteractions to reveal where the strategy could break under adversarial conditions.

How does red-team response modeling improve risk analysis?

Red-team response modeling improves risk analysis by anticipating incumbent counteractions, systematically flipping assumptions, and tracing consequences to surface mismatches between claims and evidence.

Can I use constraint inversions to detect contradictions in strategy governance?

Use constraint inversions to detect contradictions in strategy governance by flipping assumptions and tracing consequences to surface mismatches between claims, evidence, and kill conditions.

When do I need a kill-signal audit for decision gating?

You need a kill-signal audit for decision gating when preparing for execution, ensuring gap-enforcement readiness by producing actionable insights that link findings to specific hypotheses.

What are the limitations of relying only on pre-mortem planning without red-team analysis?

Relying only on pre-mortem planning without red-team analysis limits exposure to incumbent counteractions and constraint inversions, missing contradictions between claims, evidence, and kill conditions.