gaps

Identify epistemic gaps in knowledge vault notes by analyzing missing arguments and counterpoints.

11|1|Updated Mar 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/robinslange/learning-loop --skill gaps-robinslange
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gaps
Source: https://github.com/robinslange/learning-loop/tree/main/skills/gaps
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/robinslange/learning-loop --skill gaps-robinslange

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill surfaces epistemic gaps within your vault, surfacing missing arguments, absent counterpoints, and weak supporting evidence to strengthen beliefs.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Auto-picks dense clusters to surface tensions, blindspots, and absences in a knowledge vault.
  • Creates counterpoints and placeholder notes to fill knowledge gaps while preserving provenance.
  • Tracks and exposes provenance, supports /gaps workflows, and integrates with discovery and /deepen processes.

Quick Start

Invoke the gaps analysis with a topic to start surfacing tensions and gaps in your vault.

Frequently Asked Questions about gaps

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I find epistemic gaps and missing counterpoints in my knowledge vault?

Surfacing epistemic gaps in a knowledge vault involves identifying missing arguments, absent counterpoints, and weak supporting evidence across permanent, literature, and inbox notes. This analysis challenges weak beliefs by exposing blindspots and tensions within dense note clusters.

What is epistemic analysis and how does it work for knowledge management?

Epistemic analysis evaluates the strength of beliefs within a knowledge management system by tracking provenance and applying a gap analyser. It works by identifying missing arguments and absent counterpoints to expose tensions and blindspots in dense note clusters.

How do I surface counterpoints and create placeholder notes for knowledge gaps?

To surface counterpoints and create placeholder notes for knowledge gaps, run an auto-pick sweep on dense note clusters. This process generates missing arguments and placeholder notes to fill gaps while strictly preserving the provenance of existing literature and permanent notes.

Can I run a batch domain review across permanent and literature notes?

Yes, you can run a batch domain review across permanent, literature, and inbox notes. The skill supports topic-driven vault analysis and auto-pick sweeps to systematically evaluate evidence, expose blindspots, and strengthen beliefs across your entire knowledge base.

Does epistemic provenance tracking work with discovery and deepen workflows?

Epistemic provenance tracking integrates directly with discovery and deepen workflows to expose the origins of notes. It ensures that gap analysis, counterpoint generation, and placeholder creation remain fully connected to your existing knowledge management processes.