gpd-respond-to-referees

Parse referee comments, draft structured responses, and track manuscript revisions.

1|Updated Mar 29, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/CharGrnmn/roomtemp-superconductor-gpd --skill gpd-respond-to-referees-chargrnmn
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gpd-respond-to-referees
Source: https://github.com/CharGrnmn/roomtemp-superconductor-gpd/tree/main/.agents/skills/gpd-respond-to-referees
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/CharGrnmn/roomtemp-superconductor-gpd --skill gpd-respond-to-referees-chargrnmn

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires gpd, python, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of responding to referee reports and tracking manuscript revisions, streamlining the peer-review process for academic papers.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Referee Report Parsing: Automatically parses and structures referee comments for easier review.
  • Response Drafting: Generates structured response documents for both internal tracking and journal-facing letters.
  • Manuscript Revision Tracking: Tracks and manages manuscript revisions based on referee feedback.
  • Use Case: With this Skill, you can quickly and efficiently respond to referee comments, revise your manuscript accordingly, and keep track of all changes in a structured format.

Quick Start

Run the gpd-respond-to-referees skill with the path to your referee report file.

Frequently Asked Questions about gpd-respond-to-referees

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate responding to peer-review reports for academic manuscript revision?

Automating peer-review report responses involves parsing referee comments, drafting structured responses, tracking manuscript revisions, and generating journal-facing response letters. This Skill uses GPD CLI to streamline the entire peer-review process.

What is the best way to draft a structured response letter for journal referees?

The best way to draft a structured response letter is to automatically parse referee comments and generate structured response documents for both internal tracking and journal-facing communication. This ensures all reviewer feedback is addressed systematically.

How do I parse referee comments to track manuscript revisions efficiently?

To parse referee comments for manuscript revision tracking, you run the GPD CLI skill with the path to your referee report file. It automatically structures the comments to help you manage and track all required changes.

Do I need Python and GPD CLI to automate referee report parsing and response drafting?

Yes, you need Python and GPD CLI installed to automate referee report parsing and response drafting. These dependencies are required to execute the scripts that structure comments and generate response letters.

Can I track manuscript revisions and manage referee feedback in a structured format?

You can track manuscript revisions and manage referee feedback in a structured format by running this Skill. It structures the parsed comments and maintains a tracked record of all changes made based on the feedback.

What are the limitations of using GPD CLI for academic peer-review automation?

GPD CLI for academic peer-review automation requires specific Python libraries and properly formatted referee report files to function. It automates drafting and tracking but requires manual input of the referee report file path to initiate the process.