gpd-validate-conventions

Validate physics conventions across phases against state.json and SUMMARY.md.

1|Updated Mar 29, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/CharlieGreenman/roomtemp-superconductor-gpd --skill gpd-validate-conventions
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gpd-validate-conventions
Source: https://github.com/CharlieGreenman/roomtemp-superconductor-gpd/tree/main/.agents/skills/gpd-validate-conventions
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/CharlieGreenman/roomtemp-superconductor-gpd --skill gpd-validate-conventions

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Automates verification of cross-phase physics conventions to prevent drift in metric signatures, Fourier rules, and unit systems.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Loads the convention lock from state.json and CONVENTIONS.md to compare against phase declarations
  • Scans all completed phases for conventions declared in SUMMARY.md frontmatter and aggregates findings
  • Reports drift, mismatches, and unlocked conventions, with guidance to update the lock and re-run phases for reproducibility

Quick Start

Run the validate-conventions workflow across all completed phases to check cross-phase consistency

Frequently Asked Questions about gpd-validate-conventions

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check physics conventions for consistency across multiple project phases?

Physics convention drift occurs when metric signatures, Fourier conventions, or gauge choices change between phases without updating the central lock, which this validation process detects by cross-checking phase artifacts against state.json and CONVENTIONS.md.

How do I validate metric signature and Fourier convention drift in automated workflows?

Validating metric signature and Fourier convention drift requires loading the convention lock from state.json, scanning completed phase declarations, and reporting mismatches to guide updates to CONVENTIONS.md for reproducibility.

Can I enforce natural units and gauge choices across completed physics calculation phases?

Yes, you can enforce natural units and gauge choices by loading locked conventions from state.json and scanning all completed phases to identify mismatches, aggregating findings to ensure cross-phase reproducibility.

What is the best way to lock physics conventions and prevent cross-phase drift?

The best way to lock physics conventions and prevent drift is to store them in state.json and CONVENTIONS.md, then run automated validation that cross-checks phase artifacts and reports any deviations from the locked standards.

Why does my physics convention validation report unlocked conventions in state.json?

Your validation reports unlocked conventions because state.json lacks a defined lock for specific metric signatures or gauge choices, meaning the scanner detected phase declarations without a corresponding central standard to compare against.

Does cross-phase convention validation require subagents for deep artifact checking?

Yes, deep validation of cross-phase convention artifacts coordinates via subagents to thoroughly scan completed phases, ensuring that metric signatures and Fourier rules match the locked state.json configuration without manual intervention.