grill-me

Conduct adversarial reviews of project plans and design documents.

Updated Dec 17, 2025

Search Tags:#design #planning #validation #audit #strategy #review

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/Frantss/oxform --skill grill-me-frantss

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: grill-me
Source: https://github.com/Frantss/oxform/tree/main/.agents/skills/grill-me
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Frantss/oxform --skill grill-me-frantss

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the common pitfall of blind spots in project planning and design by subjecting your ideas to a rigorous, adversarial review process.

Core Features & Use Cases

Adversarial Questioning: Challenges assumptions, identifies potential failure points, and forces deeper justification of design choices.
Strategic Refinement: Helps clarify project goals and architecture by simulating a high-pressure technical interview or design review.
Use Case: Use this before finalizing a system architecture or project roadmap to ensure all edge cases and risks have been considered.

Quick Start

Initiate a grilling session by providing your project plan or design document to the AI for a critical evaluation.

Frequently Asked Questions about grill-me

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I stress-test my project plan to find architectural weaknesses?▼

Stress-testing your project plan requires an adversarial review process that challenges assumptions through high-pressure questioning, simulating a technical interview to expose architectural weaknesses and logical gaps before finalizing your strategy.

What is an adversarial design review in software engineering?▼

An adversarial design review is a rigorous validation process that critically evaluates system architecture by challenging assumptions and identifying potential failure points, forcing deeper justification of design choices to eliminate strategic blind spots.

How do I audit my system architecture for edge cases before finalizing it?▼

Auditing system architecture for edge cases requires applying structured, high-pressure questioning to your design documents to objectively assess risk, ensuring all potential failure points and logical gaps are identified before finalizing the roadmap.

Can I use an adversarial review for product management strategy validation?▼

Yes, adversarial review directly supports product management strategy validation by objectively assessing project goals and roadmaps through rigorous risk analysis, clarifying objectives and ensuring all strategic edge cases have been thoroughly considered.

When should I conduct an adversarial review of my project roadmap?▼

You should conduct an adversarial review of your project roadmap before finalizing the design to ensure all edge cases and risks have been considered, preventing blind spots in your planning and architectural strategy.

What are the limitations of using automated questioning for design validation?▼

Automated questioning for design validation focuses strictly on objective risk analysis and identifying logical gaps through structured inquiry, requiring your active engagement to refine the underlying architectural strategy and resolve identified weaknesses.