tech-divergence

Score technical implementation options across 8 dimensions to trigger Gate 4 review.

341|48|Updated Apr 4, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/WellApp-ai/Well --skill tech-divergence
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: tech-divergence
Source: https://github.com/WellApp-ai/Well/tree/main/cursor-rules/skills/tech-divergence
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/WellApp-ai/Well --skill tech-divergence

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a disciplined framework to evaluate multiple technical options for a given problem by applying an 8-dimension scoring matrix and signaling when Gate 4 should involve human decision-makers.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 8-Dimension Scoring Matrix: scores patterns, scope, data models, dependencies, API surface, reversibility, security, and performance to guide decision-making.
  • Gate 4 Trigger: automatically identifies when human input is required for high-stakes architectural decisions.
  • Plan Mode Integration: designed for Plan Mode Phase 2 (Technical Diverge) to compare alternative architectures and patterns.

Quick Start

Apply tech-divergence during Plan Mode Phase 2 to score options A, B, and C and determine whether to auto-proceed or escalate to Gate 4 for review.

Frequently Asked Questions about tech-divergence

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate and compare different technical architecture options for a project?

To evaluate technical architectures, apply an 8-dimension scoring matrix that scores patterns, scope, data models, dependencies, API surface, reversibility, security, and performance to output a recommended approach or flag for human review.

When do I need human review for architectural decision-making?

Human review for architectural decision-making is triggered at Gate 4 when high-stakes technical divergence is detected, whereas low-risk scores auto-proceed without escalation to human decision-makers.

How do I score data models and dependencies during technical divergence?

Scoring data models and dependencies during technical divergence involves applying a structured scoring matrix across 8 dimensions to compare alternative architectures and determine whether to auto-proceed or escalate to Gate 4.

What is the best way to compare performance implications across multiple valid technical approaches?

The best way to compare performance implications across valid technical approaches is using a structured scoring matrix during Plan Mode Phase 2 to quantify options and output a recommended approach or flag for Gate 4 human review.

Does this architecture evaluation process auto-proceed for low-risk technical decisions?

Yes, the architecture evaluation process features auto-proceed behavior for low-risk scores, automatically continuing without human input and only triggering Gate 4 for high-stakes architectural decisions that require manual review.

Can I use this scoring matrix outside of Plan Mode Phase 2?

The scoring matrix is specifically designed for Plan Mode Phase 2 (Technical Diverge) to compare architectures, data models, dependencies, and performance implications across multiple valid approaches to determine Gate 4 triggers.