Interrogate plans and designs to surface unresolved decisions and ambiguities.
npx skills add https://github.com/fuxiang123/unity-harness --skill grill-me-fuxiang123
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: grill-me Source: https://github.com/fuxiang123/unity-harness/tree/main/assets/github/skills/grill-me Command: npx skills add https://github.com/fuxiang123/unity-harness --skill grill-me-fuxiang123
Many plans and designs contain hidden assumptions, unresolved choices, and unexamined dependencies that lead to downstream rework or failures; this Skill systematically surfaces and resolves those uncertainties through targeted questioning until stakeholders share understanding.
Paste your plan and ask the assistant to "Grill me on this plan" so it will ask one question at a time, explore the codebase when relevant, and provide recommended answers for each decision branch.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
You validate an architecture proposal through rigorous questioning that traverses decision trees sequentially, demanding explicit answers and trade-offs to surface hidden assumptions and ambiguities before implementation begins.
A design review process that interrogates plans applies targeted questioning to surface unresolved choices and unexamined dependencies, systematically resolving uncertainties through a decision-tree traversal workflow until stakeholders share understanding.
You stress-test a PRD by requesting rigorous questioning on edge cases, dependencies, and implementation assumptions, which sequentially walks through unresolved decisions and provides recommended answers for each branch to reach consensus.
Yes, code-aware questioning explores the codebase when a question can be answered by inspection, reducing guesswork in technical designs by grounding the interrogation workflow in actual codebase conditions and dependencies.
The best way to prepare an iteration plan is running a sequential question flow that interrogates the plan to surface unexamined dependencies, providing recommended answers for each resolved branch to prevent downstream rework or failures.
Decision-tree interrogation for plan validation is not suitable for contexts where stakeholders cannot commit to a sequential question flow, or when plans lack the architectural complexity or technical dependencies required to justify rigorous questioning.
OiAnthonyInterrogate plans and designs to expose assumptions and unresolved dependencies.
JohannesKoningsInterrogate project plans and designs to resolve decision tree branches.
mohamedgshoaibQuestion project plans and architectural decisions through systematic decision-tree analysis.
SumitvedpathakAnalyze project specifications, plans, and tasks for inconsistencies and gaps.
