skills.rest
joannanowakowska
joannanowakowskaCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

grill-me

Asks probing questions to identify gaps in your plan before you commit to it.

10|Updated Jul 7, 2026
Search Tags:#planning#requirements#validation#interview#design review#risk analysis
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/joannanowakowska/plannning-poker-app --skill grill-me-joannanowakowska
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: grill-me
Source: https://github.com/joannanowakowska/plannning-poker-app/tree/main/.github/skills/grill-me
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/joannanowakowska/plannning-poker-app --skill grill-me-joannanowakowska

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you pressure-test a plan or design before implementation by surfacing missing decisions, hidden dependencies, and unresolved assumptions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured interrogation: Asks one question at a time to avoid overwhelm and keep the discussion focused.
  • Decision-by-decision review: Walks through the design tree methodically, helping you resolve each branch in sequence.
  • Context-aware clarification: Looks for facts in the codebase when possible, so you only answer the decisions that truly need your input.
  • Use case: Use it when you have a product idea, technical architecture, or workflow plan and want a rigorous review before committing to build.

Quick Start

Ask the grill-me skill to challenge your plan and guide you through the important decisions one question at a time.

Frequently Asked Questions about grill-me

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate product requirements and surface hidden dependencies before implementation?▼

To validate product requirements before implementation, you use a structured interrogation method that asks one question at a time to expose missing decisions, hidden assumptions, and dependencies methodically.

What is the best way to conduct a design review for technical architecture plans?▼

A rigorous design review for technical architecture requires sequential questioning to walk through the design tree, resolving each branch in sequence to pressure-test the plan before committing to build.

Can I use automated risk analysis to check my workflow planning assumptions?▼

Yes, risk analysis for workflow planning can look up facts in your codebase to clarify context automatically, ensuring you only manually resolve the decisions that truly need your explicit input.

Does this pre-build validation approach work for product ideas without existing code?▼

Pre-build validation works for product ideas without existing code by conducting decision-by-decision reviews, though you will need to provide explicit confirmation for each unresolved assumption during the sequential questioning process.

Why does sequential questioning help with plan validation?▼

Sequential questioning helps with plan validation by avoiding overwhelm and keeping the discussion focused, allowing you to resolve each branch of the design tree methodically before proceeding to the next decision.

Related Skills

Explore More Product & Management Skills→
sumpalabssumpalabs
10

grill-me

Interrogate plan and design decision trees to surface hidden gaps.

Official
Intermediate
Lev-itLev-it

grilling

Review plans by posing detailed questions about design and dependencies.

Official
Intermediate
znc15znc15

grill-me

Interrogate project plans and design architectures through iterative decision-tree questioning.

Community
Intermediate
pitabwirepitabwire

github-issue-workflow

Automates GitHub issue lifecycle from creation to deployment via PRs and CI validation.

Community
Advanced