grill-me

Interrogate user plans one question at a time to surface assumptions and design dependencies.

Updated Nov 16, 2022
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/kos3nz/dotfiles --skill grill-me-kos3nz
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: grill-me
Source: https://github.com/kos3nz/dotfiles/tree/main/.config/agents/skills/grill-me
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kos3nz/dotfiles --skill grill-me-kos3nz

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Grill-me helps teams reach shared understanding of complex plans by relentlessly probing assumptions, requirements, and design choices until all branches of the decision tree are explored.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Systematic, one-question-at-a-time interrogation to reveal gaps and dependencies.
  • Guided exploration that walks through each decision path and surfaces conflicting assumptions.
  • Use Case: during architecture or product planning sessions, run a grilling session to stress-test the rationale behind every major decision.

Quick Start

Present your plan and ask me to grill it until every branch is explored and understood.

Frequently Asked Questions about grill-me

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I surface hidden assumptions during product planning and architecture discussions?

Relentlessly interrogate your product plan using one-question-at-a-time dialogue to surface hidden assumptions and design dependencies. This systematic grilling exposes gaps and conflicting stakeholder alignment across all decision branches.

What is the best way to stress-test the rationale behind every major roadmap decision?

Stress-test roadmap decisions through guided branch-by-branch exploration that walks each decision path. This systematic interrogation probes rationale until all decision tree branches are fully explored and stakeholder alignment is reached.

Can I use an interactive questioning method to reach shared understanding of complex design reviews?

Yes, reach shared understanding of design reviews through interactive grilling that guides one-question-at-a-time dialogue. It provides recommended answers to systematically resolve conflicting assumptions and design dependencies.

How do I identify conflicting assumptions and design dependencies in a roadmap?

Run a grilling session on your roadmap using one-question-at-a-time dialogue to identify conflicting assumptions and design dependencies. This systematic interrogation explores each decision path to reveal underlying gaps.

What are the limitations of using one-question-at-a-time interrogation for stakeholder alignment?

A limitation of one-question-at-a-time interrogation is that it requires deep branch-by-branch questioning across all decision paths. It is suited for architecture discussions and roadmap planning rather than quick or superficial design reviews.