grill-with-docs

You can stress-test a product plan against a domain model by running a one-question-at-a-time grilling session that challenges design decisions and updates CONTEXT.md and ADRs inline as decisions crystallize.

The best way to keep ADRs and CONTEXT.md updated during design discussions is to apply crystallized decisions live during a guided interrogation, ensuring domain-aligned choices are cross-referenced with the codebase.

Yes, you can validate domain concepts against your codebase through optional codebase exploration during the grilling session to ensure terminology and decisions match the repository.

Interactive design decision grilling works by asking one question at a time across design branches, forcing teams to resolve dependencies between decisions before moving forward.

You need a domain model to test against, and the session will update CONTEXT.md and ADRs as decisions are made, ensuring your documentation reflects the agreed terminology and design choices.

You should use an interactive grilling session when your team needs to challenge a project plan, sharpen domain terminology, and ensure cross-referenced documentation updates happen live as decisions are finalized.