grill-with-docs

Reviews and validates project plans through domain-focused, structured questioning.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Ermianr/meteor --skill grill-with-docs-ermianr
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: grill-with-docs
Source: https://github.com/Ermianr/meteor/tree/main/.claude/skills/grill-with-docs
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Ermianr/meteor --skill grill-with-docs-ermianr

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill facilitates in-depth analysis and validation of project plans by conducting structured, domain-focused discussions to ensure alignment and clarity.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Plan Stress-Testing: Challenges and sharpens your project assumptions against existing domain models.
  • Documentation Updates: Inline editing and refinement of CONTEXT.md, ADRs, and other documentation during sessions.
  • Use Case: When developing a new feature, use this Skill to interrogate your design choices, validate terminology, and update relevant documentation seamlessly.

Quick Start

Interview me about my project plan and help me review and refine it based on domain expertise.

Frequently Asked Questions about grill-with-docs

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate project plans using domain-driven design discussions?

You validate project plans by engaging in structured, domain-focused discussions that challenge assumptions and ensure terminology alignment. This process interrogates design choices against existing domain models to improve project clarity and overall alignment.

What is the best way to update CONTEXT.md and ADRs during a project review?

The best way to update CONTEXT.md and ADRs is through inline editing during domain-driven discussion sessions. This allows you to refine documentation seamlessly while validating project plans and capturing architectural decisions directly within the repository.

How does domain context analysis improve project clarity for new features?

Domain context analysis improves project clarity by applying structured questioning to interrogate design choices. This ensures accurate domain terminology, validates assumptions against existing models, and refines project alignment before implementation begins.

Can I stress-test project assumptions against existing domain models in a complex codebase?

Yes, you can stress-test project assumptions against existing domain models within complex codebases. The Skill supports iterative discussion and contextual analysis to challenge and sharpen your project assumptions directly in the repository.

Why does my project validation require structured questioning during design reviews?

Project validation requires structured questioning to systematically expose misalignments and validate terminology. Without it, domain-driven discussions lack the rigor needed to accurately interrogate design choices and document decisions effectively.

What are the limitations of inline documentation updates during domain-driven discussions?

A limitation of inline documentation updates is that they require active iterative engagement to be effective. The process depends heavily on structured questioning and contextual analysis; without continuous input, documentation refinement may stall.