grill-with-docs

To stress-test a project plan against existing domain documentation, you run a guided grilling session that interrogates plan assumptions question-by-question to surface ambiguities and resolve terminology conflicts using your documented domain model.

The best way to keep CONTEXT.md and ADRs in sync is to apply inline documentation updates during planning sessions, revising records as decisions crystallize rather than waiting until after the session ends.

You resolve terminology conflicts when planning new features by challenging your plan against the existing domain model through a question-by-question exploration flow that reveals dependencies and enforces terminology alignment.

Yes, you can update architecture decision records while interrogating plan assumptions. The grilling process records decisions and ensures ADR documentation stays in sync with the evolving plan as decisions crystallize.

You should use a question-by-question exploration flow for project planning when you need to surface hidden ambiguities, resolve terminology conflicts, and ensure documentation stays aligned with the evolving plan before implementation begins.