grill-with-domain-modeling

To document architectural decisions during planning, you can use a structured interview process that synchronizes domain modeling with ADR creation. This approach enforces strict separation between plan confirmation and formal documentation to prevent cognitive overload and ensure clarity.

The best way to maintain a domain glossary and ADRs simultaneously is through an integrated planning session that automatically captures CONTEXT.md and architectural decisions as they are made, eliminating fragmentation between high-level planning and technical documentation.

You need to create architectural decision records before writing code when starting a complex feature that requires rigorous planning, ensuring domain knowledge and glossaries are captured and validated upfront.

Yes, you can validate technical plans and generate documentation artifacts simultaneously by conducting a structured grill session that enforces creation of ADRs and glossaries, where plan confirmation strictly precedes formalization of architectural decisions.

Separating plan confirmation from ADR creation matters because it prevents cognitive overload and ensures clarity by enforcing a strict sequential workflow where technical plans are fully validated before formal architectural decisions are documented.

Yes, this domain modeling approach works without external dependencies, operating as a standalone structured planning session that facilitates interviews, validates plans, and enforces documentation artifact creation through its own internal workflow.