grimoire-review

A multi-perspective design review evaluates a completed design's manifest, decisions, and tasks across expert personas. It analyzes completeness, feasibility, security, and data integrity, outputting structured blockers and suggestions to ensure readiness before implementation.

To run a security and data integrity design review, you must provide the completed design artifacts. This includes the manifest, decisions, and tasks related to your change, which are analyzed to validate data integrity and security before coding.

You should conduct a multi-perspective review after your design plan is complete but before coding begins. It serves as a validation gate between design and implementation, ensuring the architecture and decisions are feasible and secure before applying changes.

An architecture and security design review outputs structured findings categorized by expert personas. You receive specific blockers that prevent implementation, actionable suggestions for improvement, and references to design artifacts to guide the next steps.

Yes, this design review explicitly checks if your design changes are feasible. It analyzes the provided manifest, decisions, and tasks to evaluate completeness and feasibility across multiple expert perspectives before you start the coding phase.

The automated persona review focuses strictly on the artifacts provided, analyzing manifest, decisions, and tasks for security and data integrity. It does not replace human judgment but structures findings into blockers and suggestions to guide subsequent implementation.