gsd-discuss-phase

To clarify implementation decisions before planning, use adaptive questioning to resolve gray areas. This approach loads prior project context, distinguishes settled choices from open questions, and generates a context file for downstream execution.

Capturing phase context requires generating a CONTEXT.md file that records settled choices. This file passes phase-specific implementation decisions to downstream agents, allowing them to execute planning without re-asking the user repetitive questions.

To stop downstream agents from re-asking questions, produce a phase-specific context file. By resolving gray areas and recording implementation decisions upfront, downstream planners can load reusable context without requiring user interviews.

Yes, this discussion workflow requires prior project state inspection. The process selectively deep dives into existing project context to identify settled architecture constraints and dependencies before generating the final context file.

You need adaptive questioning for software project planning when resolving gray areas across discussion and planning workflows. It targets specific unresolved implementation decisions rather than conducting broad, repetitive interviews with the team.

Yes, you can use this context gathering workflow for architecture constraints and dependencies. It collects phase-specific context and resolves these implementation decisions so downstream work proceeds with clear scope.