gsd-discuss-phase

Resolving undecided planning constraints requires gathering implementation-phase context through adaptive questioning. This process loads prior requirements, identifies gray areas, and uses user-selected topics to produce concrete decisions for downstream agents to act on without re-asking.

Capturing project decisions for downstream agents is achieved by generating a phase-specific CONTEXT.md file. This document contains implementation decisions detailed enough to enable researcher and planner agents to execute tasks independently without seeking further user clarification.

Eliminating gray areas in project requirements involves loading prior context such as PROJECT, REQUIREMENTS, and STATE files. The system identifies only what remains undecided and applies adaptive questioning to explore those specific topics to completion.

Mode flags like --assumptions and --power can be used to route workflow execution. The system chooses the correct discuss workflow based on the default mode or specific flags provided, ensuring adaptive discussion tailored to the selected phase.

Yes, this approach works with existing project state and requirements files by loading prior context. It reads PROJECT, REQUIREMENTS, STATE, and prior CONTEXT files to identify remaining undecided constraints before generating updated decision-grade context outputs.

Planning agents waste cycles on assumptions when implementation-phase context is not gathered and clarified early. By resolving decisions through adaptive questioning before planning, downstream agents receive concrete context and avoid acting on incomplete or ambiguous constraints.