gsd-ns-review

Route user requests to the appropriate quality review workflow.

Updated May 21, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jedmamosto/m-and-ms --skill gsd-ns-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gsd-ns-review
Source: https://github.com/jedmamosto/m-and-ms/tree/main/.agents/skills/gsd-ns-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jedmamosto/m-and-ms --skill gsd-ns-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It eliminates delays and misrouted tasks by selecting the appropriate quality gate action (review, audit, security, UI/UX, validation, debug, or forensics) based on what the user is trying to accomplish.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Quality-gate routing: Choose the correct downstream review skill for code quality, UAT/acceptance, security phase checks, AI response evaluation, UI/design accessibility review, and phase output validation.
  • Debug & forensics dispatch: Route failed-feature investigations to the right debug or forensic workflow.
  • Auto-fix option selection: Supports invoking a fix-enabled code review pathway when requested.

Quick Start

Tell the Skill what kind of review you need (e.g., code review, security review, UI review, UAT audit, AI evaluation, validation, debug, or forensics) and it will invoke the matched quality gate skill for you.

Frequently Asked Questions about gsd-ns-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I route my software engineering task to the correct quality gate action?

To route a software engineering task to the correct quality gate, describe your intent such as needing a code review, security audit, or UI accessibility check. The skill matches your intent and invokes the appropriate downstream review, validation, or debugging workflow automatically.

What is the best way to trigger an automated code review with auto-fix capabilities?

The best way to trigger an automated code review with auto-fix is to explicitly request a fix-enabled code review pathway. The routing skill detects this command form and dispatches your request to the matched quality gate skill that applies corrections and reviews code quality.

Can I use this routing skill for both UI accessibility review and UAT acceptance auditing?

Yes, you can use this routing skill for UI accessibility review and UAT acceptance auditing. It evaluates your intent and routes the request to the correct downstream quality gate skill, handling both UX accessibility checks and user acceptance testing evaluations.

Does this routing mechanism support forensic investigation and failure analysis dispatch?

Yes, this routing mechanism supports forensic investigation and failure analysis dispatch. When you report a failed feature investigation, it identifies the intent and routes the scenario to the appropriate debug or forensic workflow to conduct the necessary failure analysis.

When do I need a phase security evaluation instead of a standard code review?

You need a phase security evaluation instead of a standard code review when your goal is a phase-specific security check rather than general code quality. The routing skill distinguishes between these intents, directing security phase checks to the correct audit workflow.