gsd-ns-review

Route user intent to the appropriate quality gate review workflow.

4|1|Updated Mar 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/lgwanai/openforce --skill gsd-ns-review-lgwanai
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gsd-ns-review
Source: https://github.com/lgwanai/openforce/tree/main/skills/gsd-ns-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/lgwanai/openforce --skill gsd-ns-review-lgwanai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It helps you quickly reach the correct quality, review, audit, security, evaluation, UI, validation, debug, or forensics workflow instead of manually picking among multiple review skills.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Intent-based quality gate routing: Selects the appropriate downstream review skill based on what the user is trying to do (e.g., correctness, security, UI, UAT, eval).
  • Fast triage for common scenarios: Covers code review with optional auto-fix, UAT/acceptance audit, phase security review, AI response evaluation, UI review/accessibility checks, phase output validation, debugging, and forensic investigation.
  • Guided direct invocation: Triggers the matched skill directly via the Skill tool to keep execution deterministic and consistent.

Quick Start

Ask OpenForce to run the appropriate gate for your goal, for example: "Security review of this release phase and highlight risks."

Frequently Asked Questions about gsd-ns-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I route intent to the right quality gate for code review and security audits?

Quality gate routing analyzes your stated goal and selects the appropriate downstream workflow. It then directly invokes the matched review skill via deterministic execution, ensuring correct triage for code review, security audits, or debugging tasks.

What is the best way to run a phase security review and highlight risks?

A phase security review is triggered by routing your release-phase intent to the appropriate quality gate. The system maps the security audit request and directly invokes the matched skill to evaluate compliance-oriented risks across your artifacts.

Can I use this for UI accessibility checks and UAT testing?

Yes, UI accessibility checks and UAT testing are supported. The intent router triages these specific requests and triggers the corresponding quality gate workflow to validate acceptance criteria and review interface compliance.

Does this approach support AI response evaluation and phase output validation?

AI response evaluation and phase output validation are fully supported workflows. By interpreting your intent, the router selects the correct quality gate to assess AI outputs and validate phase deliverables deterministically.

When do I need to use intent-to-skill mapping for debugging and forensics?

Intent-to-skill mapping is needed for debugging and forensics when you require deterministic, guided invocation of investigative workflows. It routes troubleshooting goals directly to the specialized forensic analysis skill without manual selection.