gxpm-grill

To surface ambiguities in a design plan, you can grill the plan against a domain model to resolve assumptions, tighten terminology, and identify unresolved dependencies through relentless questioning. This process crystallizes decisions for documentation updates.

Generating ADRs and updating CONTEXT.md from design branches involves stress-testing the plan to align domain decisions. This automated documentation capture records architectural decisions and aligns glossary terminology to prevent term drift.

Aligning domain terminology with unclear terms requires cross-referencing the plan against CONTEXT.md. This glossary alignment prevents term drift by surfacing hidden assumptions and tightening definitions across design artifacts before implementation begins.

Yes, this approach supports end-to-end decision capture by generating structured artifact outputs. When grilling a plan, it produces auditable acceptance contracts, implementation plans, and ADRs to ensure a repeatable decision process.

You need to stress-test a plan against a domain model when a plan has unresolved dependencies, unclear terms, or hidden assumptions. It is specifically required when design branches demand alignment across CONTEXT.md and ADRs.

To start grilling a plan and resolve design uncertainties, initiate the process by asking one clarifying question at a time. This relentless questioning exposes edge cases and dependencies to align domain decisions effectively.