hazop-facilitator

Structure node-based HAZOP workshops per IEC 61882 with de-identification and SME review.

1|Updated Jun 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ashley-eyekyam/hse-leadership-skills --skill hazop-facilitator
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: hazop-facilitator
Source: https://github.com/ashley-eyekyam/hse-leadership-skills/tree/main/skills/hazop-facilitator
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ashley-eyekyam/hse-leadership-skills --skill hazop-facilitator

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Generic AI tools produce HAZOP worksheets with fabricated deviations, unsupported risk values, leaked personal data, and PPE-only safeguards that fail regulatory review. This skill eliminates those failures by enforcing structured, team-only input capture, mandatory de-identification, and hierarchy of controls compliance for every safeguard.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Compliant IEC 61882 Workflow: Builds the guideword × parameter matrix, captures deviation → cause → consequence → safeguard → recommendation chains exactly as the live multidisciplinary team supplies them, and never invents data the team did not raise.
  • Built-in Safety Guardrails: Mandatory de-identification of all personal/health data, hierarchy of controls ranking for safeguards, [GAP] recording for unsupplied values instead of fabrication, and mandatory SME review before any output is shared.
  • Use Case: Process safety engineers, HAZOP chairs, and O&G/process industry safety teams running new, revalidation, or write-up HAZOP studies for specific P&ID nodes, ensuring defensible, regulator-ready documentation.

Quick Start

Use the hazop-facilitator skill to structure a compliant HAZOP worksheet for your named P&ID node, recording the live multidisciplinary team's findings as you work through the guideword × parameter matrix.

Frequently Asked Questions about hazop-facilitator

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I structure a HAZOP worksheet that complies with IEC 61882?

To structure a compliant HAZOP worksheet, build the guideword × parameter matrix for your P&ID node and capture the deviation → cause → consequence → safeguard → recommendation chains exactly as the multidisciplinary team supplies them.

Why does my AI-generated HAZOP documentation fail regulatory review?

HAZOP documentation fails regulatory review when AI tools fabricate deviations, use unsupported risk values, or leak personal data. Enforcing team-only input capture and mandatory de-identification eliminates these compliance failures.

How do I handle missing risk values during a HAZOP study without fabricating data?

When risk values or inputs are unsupplied during a HAZOP study, record them using [GAP] notation instead of fabricating data, ensuring the worksheet remains defensible and accurately reflects the live team findings.

Can I use this HAZOP facilitation process for revalidation studies on existing P&ID nodes?

Yes, this HAZOP facilitation process applies to new, revalidation, and write-up HAZOP studies for oil, gas, process, and chemical industry P&ID nodes, capturing live multidisciplinary team findings into defensible worksheets.

What is the hierarchy of controls ranking requirement for HAZOP safeguards?

The hierarchy of controls ranking requirement ensures HAZOP safeguards are documented beyond PPE-only measures, ranking them properly to meet regulatory and internal safety governance standards for process safety documentation.

When should I require SME review before finalizing process safety documentation?

You should require mandatory SME review before any HAZOP output is shared to verify that de-identification, hierarchy of controls compliance, and accurate team findings meet regulatory and internal safety governance standards.