health-model-review

Audit portfolio health model tier distributions, component weights, and signal freshness.

58|21|Updated May 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/t0ddc3by/claude-for-customer-success --skill health-model-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: health-model-review
Source: https://github.com/t0ddc3by/claude-for-customer-success/tree/main/cs-ops/skills/health-model-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/t0ddc3by/claude-for-customer-success --skill health-model-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It identifies whether your portfolio health model is misclassifying accounts due to distribution anomalies, stale signals, or incorrect component weights, and it can recommend calibration improvements grounded in the available evidence.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Portfolio distribution audit: Detects tier distribution shifts (e.g., too many Green or skewed Red) and quantifies how much ARR sits in each tier.
  • Component weight & coverage review: Flags components with low data coverage or staleness so you can separate missing-data issues from true scoring problems.
  • Calibration / predictive accuracy check: Evaluates whether health tiers correlate with renewal outcomes (requires churn history), and surfaces false positives vs. false negatives.
  • Use Case: Before a quarterly CS-Ops calibration meeting, you run a full audit to decide whether the tier thresholds need adjustment and what evidence supports that decision.

Quick Start

Run /cs-ops:health-model-review to produce a full portfolio health model audit with calibration recommendations.

Frequently Asked Questions about health-model-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit my CS health model for tier distribution anomalies?

To audit CS health model distribution anomalies, this Skill analyzes portfolio health data to detect tier distribution shifts and quantifies how much ARR sits in each tier. It flags skewed Green, Yellow, or Red classifications to identify misclassification issues.

Why does my customer health model show too many Green accounts despite churn?

Customer health models show too many Green accounts due to stale signals, low component data coverage, or incorrect component weights. This Skill separates missing-data issues from true scoring problems and evaluates calibration against actual renewal outcomes.

How do I recalibrate health model component weights before a quarterly CS Ops review?

To recalibrate health model component weights for a CS Ops review, run a full audit to evaluate component weight validity and signal freshness. The Skill provides evidence-based guidance on governance for recommended scoring changes.

Can I check if my health model tiers correlate with actual churn outcomes?

You can check health model predictive accuracy by correlating tiers with churn outcomes when historical renewal data is available. The Skill evaluates alignment and surfaces false positives versus false negatives in Green, Yellow, and Red classifications.

What data do I need to run a predictive accuracy check on my portfolio health model?

Running a predictive accuracy check on a portfolio health model requires health model configuration data and portfolio health data. To assess calibration against churn outcomes, historical renewal data must also be available for the analysis.

Does this health model audit modify my live scoring configurations?

This health model audit does not modify live scoring configurations because it enforces strictly read-only analysis. It provides governance guidance for any recommended calibration changes, ensuring you control implementation.