hld-review

To evaluate an HLD, review the document against linked architecture decision records and project requirements. The process generates a structured report with scores across six critical dimensions, severity-rated findings, and actionable next steps for design improvement.

To evaluate an HLD against architecture decision records, compare the design document to your ADRs, project requirements, and architecture principles. This yields a scored report across six dimensions with severity-rated findings and actionable next steps for improvement.

An architecture design review scores six dimensions: ADR Coverage, Requirements Traceability, Principle Compliance, Security Architecture, Integration Clarity, and Operational Readiness. These scores quantify alignment with project requirements and established architecture principles.

Yes, you can automate compliance and security checks by running an HLD evaluation on the microservice design. The review identifies gaps in security architecture and ADR coverage, generating severity-rated findings and actionable next steps to ensure robust design.

An HLD evaluation generates severity-rated findings categorized as Blocking, Advisory, or Informational. It provides scores across six dimensions and suggests actionable next steps to resolve identified design flaws and improve system quality.