humaniseur-fr

Detect and rewrite 27 AI-writing patterns in French text while preserving register.

Updated May 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Oatse/CWE-Automation --skill humaniseur-fr-oatse
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: humaniseur-fr
Source: https://github.com/Oatse/CWE-Automation/tree/main/.agents/skills/humaniseur-fr
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Oatse/CWE-Automation --skill humaniseur-fr-oatse

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? French text generated by LLMs carries recognizable artifacts: overused vocabulary like « crucial » and « notamment », anglicisms such as « faire du sens », superficial -ant participles, em dash overuse, and formulaic openings. This Skill identifies and removes 27 documented AI-writing patterns from French content, then injects genuine voice and personality so the result reads as human-authored. ## Core Features & Use Cases - 27-pattern detection and repair: Covers AI vocabulary, anglicisms from English-first models, copula avoidance, negative parallelisms, rule of three, synonym cycling, false ranges, redundant adjective doublets, sycophantic tone, conversation artifacts, and structural uniformity. - French typography correction: Converts curly quotes to guillemets, fixes spacing before punctuation, removes Oxford commas, and corrects number formatting. - Register preservation: Maintains « langage soutenu » when the input is formal; never downgrades legal or academic prose to casual French. - Voice injection (Part 3): Adds opinions, first person, varied rhythm, and second-degree irony so cleaned text does not read as sterile. - Use Case: Paste a ChatGPT-drafted French blog post full of « dans le paysage actuel » and « il convient de noter que »; receive a draft rewrite, a self-audit of remaining AI tells, and a final humanized version with a summary of removed patterns. ## Quick Start Humanize this French text and remove all AI-writing patterns while keeping its original register.

Frequently Asked Questions about humaniseur-fr

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I remove AI-writing patterns from French text?

Scan the text for the 27 documented patterns: AI vocabulary like « crucial » and « notamment », anglicisms like « faire du sens », superficial -ant participles, and formulaic openings. Rewrite each flagged section with natural alternatives, then run a final self-audit asking what still makes the text obviously AI-generated.

What are the most common signs of AI-generated French writing?

The top tells are the word « crucial », overuse of « notamment » (4x human frequency), anglicisms like « adresser un problème », copula avoidance (« constitue », « dispose de »), em dash overuse, and openings like « Dans le paysage actuel ». Structural uniformity across paragraphs is another strong marker.

Does humanizing French text mean making it more informal?

No. The core rule is to never lower the language register. Formal French with subordinate clauses and precise connectors is legitimate human writing; only formulaic and mechanical phrasing should be removed. Legal and academic texts must keep their specialized vocabulary.

Can this fix anglicisms produced by English-first language models?

Yes. It targets architecture-driven anglicisms such as « faire du sens » (use « avoir du sens »), « adresser un problème » (use « traiter »), « impacter », and Oxford commas before « et », which do not exist in French punctuation conventions.

Why does my French text still sound artificial after removing obvious AI words?

Vocabulary cleanup is only half the work. Remaining issues are usually structural uniformity (sentences of identical length and rhythm) and soullessness: no opinions, no first person, no specific facts. The fix is varying sentence length and injecting genuine voice.

What are the limitations of automated AI-text humanization?

The process rewrites style but cannot invent real facts, sources, or lived experience. Vague attributions like « les experts estiment » must be replaced with genuine citations or dropped, and fabricated specificity remains a risk that requires human fact-checking.