ibank-team-review

Review iBank worklogs and output an approve, revise, or reject decision.

Updated Jun 5, 2026

Search Tags:#decision #quality #review #team-lead #worklogs #iBank

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/KangJiSseok/ACODIAN --skill ibank-team-review

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ibank-team-review
Source: https://github.com/KangJiSseok/ACODIAN/tree/main/.codex/skills/ibank-team-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/KangJiSseok/ACODIAN --skill ibank-team-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The iBank Team Review skill enables a designated team lead to evaluate existing worklogs and produce clear approval, revision, or rejection decisions, ensuring quality and alignment with project goals.

Core Features & Use Cases

Role-aligned review from the team lead perspective focusing on fit, timing, dependencies, and collaboration
Generates concise decisions (approve, revise, or reject) and actionable feedback
Suitable for batch reviews, pre-release checks, and ongoing quality assurance of worklogs

Quick Start

Paste the worklogs into chat to receive an approval, revision request, or rejection decision based on the team-lead checklist.

Frequently Asked Questions about ibank-team-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I review worklog quality from a team lead perspective?▼

To review worklog quality, you can use a team-lead checklist to evaluate worklogs and generate concise approve, revise, or reject decisions based on team-fit, timing, and collaboration assessment.

What is the best way to assess team-fit and timing in worklogs for pre-release checks?▼

Assessing team-fit and timing in worklogs requires a role-aligned review from the designated team lead perspective, evaluating dependencies and collaboration quality to ensure alignment with project goals.

Can I perform batch reviews of existing worklogs for quality assurance?▼

Yes, you can perform batch reviews of existing worklogs for ongoing quality assurance by pasting the worklogs into chat to receive actionable feedback and approval decisions.

Do I need a designated team lead persona file to evaluate worklogs?▼

Yes, a designated team lead persona file and a team-lead checklist are required to evaluate worklogs and produce clear approval, revision, or rejection decisions.

How does the approve, revise, or reject decision mechanism work for worklog reviews?▼

The decision mechanism works by reviewing pasted worklogs against a team-lead checklist, analyzing quality, timing, and dependencies to output a concise approve, revise, or reject decision.

What are the limitations of automating worklog quality reviews?▼

Automating worklog quality reviews is limited by the necessity of a predefined team lead persona file and checklist, meaning it cannot evaluate worklogs without these designated persona inputs.