ibank-team-review

Review iBank worklogs and output an approve, revise, or reject decision.

Updated Jun 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/KangJiSseok/ACODIAN --skill ibank-team-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ibank-team-review
Source: https://github.com/KangJiSseok/ACODIAN/tree/main/.codex/skills/ibank-team-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/KangJiSseok/ACODIAN --skill ibank-team-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The iBank Team Review skill enables a designated team lead to evaluate existing worklogs and produce clear approval, revision, or rejection decisions, ensuring quality and alignment with project goals.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Role-aligned review from the team lead perspective focusing on fit, timing, dependencies, and collaboration
  • Generates concise decisions (approve, revise, or reject) and actionable feedback
  • Suitable for batch reviews, pre-release checks, and ongoing quality assurance of worklogs

Quick Start

Paste the worklogs into chat to receive an approval, revision request, or rejection decision based on the team-lead checklist.

Frequently Asked Questions about ibank-team-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review worklog quality from a team lead perspective?

To review worklog quality, you can use a team-lead checklist to evaluate worklogs and generate concise approve, revise, or reject decisions based on team-fit, timing, and collaboration assessment.

What is the best way to assess team-fit and timing in worklogs for pre-release checks?

Assessing team-fit and timing in worklogs requires a role-aligned review from the designated team lead perspective, evaluating dependencies and collaboration quality to ensure alignment with project goals.

Can I perform batch reviews of existing worklogs for quality assurance?

Yes, you can perform batch reviews of existing worklogs for ongoing quality assurance by pasting the worklogs into chat to receive actionable feedback and approval decisions.

Do I need a designated team lead persona file to evaluate worklogs?

Yes, a designated team lead persona file and a team-lead checklist are required to evaluate worklogs and produce clear approval, revision, or rejection decisions.

How does the approve, revise, or reject decision mechanism work for worklog reviews?

The decision mechanism works by reviewing pasted worklogs against a team-lead checklist, analyzing quality, timing, and dependencies to output a concise approve, revise, or reject decision.

What are the limitations of automating worklog quality reviews?

Automating worklog quality reviews is limited by the necessity of a predefined team lead persona file and checklist, meaning it cannot evaluate worklogs without these designated persona inputs.