implementation-review

Automate three-pass code reviews to verify RFC design intent and code quality.

Updated Apr 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/GiantCroissant-Lunar/proto-breakout --skill implementation-review-giantcroissant-lunar
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: implementation-review
Source: https://github.com/GiantCroissant-Lunar/proto-breakout/tree/main/.agent/skills/00-meta/implementation-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/GiantCroissant-Lunar/proto-breakout --skill implementation-review-giantcroissant-lunar

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Three-pass review process to ensure RFC design intent survives implementation and to catch critical issues early.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Pass 0: verify design intent against RFCs
  • Pass 1: flag critical issues (frame budget, memory, state sync, serialization)
  • Pass 2: surface informational findings and triage

Quick Start

Review a PR, branch diff, or code change using the three-pass framework.

Frequently Asked Questions about implementation-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code reviews to verify RFC design intent in a PR?

Automate code reviews by applying a three-pass framework to your PR or branch diff, verifying RFC alignment in Pass 0, flagging critical issues in Pass 1, and surfacing informational findings in Pass 2.

What is the three-pass code review process for game development?

The three-pass code review process sequentially verifies design intent against RFCs, flags critical game development issues like frame budget and memory, and triages informational findings into auto, ASK, or escalate categories.

How do I triage PR diff findings into auto, ASK, and escalate categories?

Triage PR diff findings by running the third review pass, which surfaces informational findings and automatically categorizes them into auto, ASK, or escalate actions based on severity and context.

Can I use this three-pass review on branch diffs instead of full pull requests?

Yes, you can apply the three-pass review to branch diffs, PRs, or general code changes to validate design intent and catch critical issues like state sync and serialization errors.

What critical issues does a design intent code review catch during implementation?

A design intent code review catches critical game development issues including frame budget overruns, memory leaks, state sync failures, and serialization problems during the second review pass.

When do I need an RFC alignment check for my code changes?

You need an RFC alignment check when implementing a pull request to ensure the original design intent survives the implementation phase and prevents critical architectural drift.