integrity-forensics

Audit research papers for integrity violations with SHA-pinned forensic sweeps.

1|Updated Jul 21, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/dogekiki/SP-test --skill integrity-forensics
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: integrity-forensics
Source: https://github.com/dogekiki/SP-test/tree/main/.trae/skills/integrity-forensics
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/dogekiki/SP-test --skill integrity-forensics

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill addresses the critical need for rigorous, deterministic integrity checks on research papers, preventing the submission of flawed or unverified work by automating the detection of common research integrity issues.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Deterministic Adjudication: Uses a rules-only adjudicator to verify claims against evidence, ensuring findings are span-anchored and verifiable.
  • Policy Gate Enforcement: Converts forensic findings into actionable policy gates (BLOCK/WARN/NO_NEW_BLOCKER) to maintain submission standards.
  • Use Case: Before submitting a manuscript, use this skill to perform a comprehensive forensic sweep to identify potential numeric inconsistencies, citation errors, or experiment integrity gaps.

Quick Start

Run the integrity forensics skill on the current paper directory to perform a full audit and generate an obligations ledger.

Frequently Asked Questions about integrity-forensics

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run an automated research integrity audit before submitting a manuscript?

To run an automated research integrity audit, execute the forensic sweep on your current paper directory to identify numeric inconsistencies, citation errors, and experiment gaps, generating an obligations ledger for pre-submission self-checks.

What is span-anchored evidence verification in academic forensics?

Span-anchored evidence verification is a deterministic adjudication process that verifies research claims against source evidence, ensuring all findings are verifiable and directly linked to specific text spans within the academic submission.

How does policy gate enforcement work for peer-review processes?

Policy gate enforcement converts forensic findings into actionable submission gates like BLOCK, WARN, or NO_NEW_BLOCKER, maintaining academic pipeline standards by automatically blocking or flagging research integrity violations during peer review.

Can I use deterministic adjudication to check compliance on my research papers?

Yes, you can use rules-only deterministic adjudication to check compliance on research papers, applying a SHA-pinned sweep to detect integrity violations and generate an append-only obligations tracking ledger.

What is the best way to track academic integrity obligations during submission?

The best way to track academic integrity obligations is using an append-only ledger generated by a forensic audit, which records all verified claims and policy gate enforcement actions for the submission pipeline.

Are there limitations to automated forensic audits for research integrity?

Automated forensic audits for research integrity rely on rules-only adjudication, meaning they enforce deterministic policy gates but do not provide subjective qualitative peer review or assess scientific novelty.