investigation-query

Generate evidence-cited Q&A from investigation file chronology, evidence log, and interview notes.

100|16|Updated May 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish --skill investigation-query-zekaisuni
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: investigation-query
Source: https://github.com/ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/tree/main/employment-legal/skills/investigation-query
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish --skill investigation-query-zekaisuni

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It helps you extract an accurate, evidence-based timeline and Q&A directly from an open investigation file without inventing missing facts.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Source-grounded responses: Answers must cite the specific evidence record (e.g., a particular delil/görüşme/kronoloji entry) used to justify the output.
  • No guessing under uncertainty: If the requested information is not present in the file, the output explicitly states that the document does not contain it.
  • Risk flagging for key legal areas: It highlights issues related to lawful termination, defense, and KVKK risk when detected, so you can prioritize review.

Quick Start

Provide the investigation record identifier and the exact question you need answered in the command format so the assistant returns a short answer with “Dayanak” and “Belirsizlik” sections.

Frequently Asked Questions about investigation-query

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I reconstruct a timeline from legal investigation files without guessing missing facts?

To reconstruct a case timeline from legal investigation files, you process chronology, evidence logs, and interview notes while explicitly stating when requested information is absent. This ensures an evidence-based timeline without inventing missing facts.

How do I map specific assertions in HR investigation files to their source records?

To map assertions in HR investigation files, you attach specific evidence citations, such as particular evidence or interview entries, to each output. This grounds every claim in a verifiable source record within the file.

Can I use automated question answering to identify KVKK risks in employment law cases?

Yes, you can identify KVKK risks in employment law cases using controlled question answering. It flags KVKK risk indicators alongside lawful termination and defense relevance issues directly from the investigation file's evidence log.

What is the best way to handle uncertainty when reviewing legal evidence logs?

The best way to handle uncertainty when reviewing legal evidence logs is to explicitly state that the document does not contain the requested information. This no-guessing approach separates facts from uncertainty in the output.

How do I flag lawful termination issues during an HR investigation review?

To flag lawful termination issues during an HR investigation review, you analyze interview notes and chronology entries to highlight defense relevance and termination issues. This prioritizes review tasks for legal compliance.