ip-clause-review

Review IP clauses in legal agreements and generate a prioritized risk memo.

Updated May 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jrhueiueng/codex-for-legal --skill ip-clause-review-jrhueiueng
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ip-clause-review
Source: https://github.com/jrhueiueng/codex-for-legal/tree/main/plugins/jrhueiueng/codex-for-legal/skills/ip-legal__ip-clause-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jrhueiueng/codex-for-legal --skill ip-clause-review-jrhueiueng

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you review an agreement’s IP provisions (assignment, ownership, license grants, and IP warranties/indemnities) and produce a lawyer-ready risk memo that flags gaps and inconsistencies before signing.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • IP clause risk analysis: Reviews assignment/work-for-hire, ownership of deliverables, background vs. foreground IP, license scope, and related IP warranties and indemnities.
  • Assignment gap detection: Prioritizes missing or weak assignment mechanics (e.g., “agrees to assign” vs. “hereby assigns,” missing moral rights waiver, missing further assurances).
  • Cross-clause consistency checks: Verifies the system works as a whole (grant vs. warranty vs. indemnity vs. termination) rather than treating clauses in isolation.
  • Memo with severity ranking and proposed redlines: Outputs a structured, prioritized memo with escalation guidance and a clear approval routing summary.

Quick Start

Run the command ip-legal:ip-clause-review with a file path to the agreement you want reviewed, and it will generate a prioritized clause-by-clause memo of the IP risks and suggested redlines.

Frequently Asked Questions about ip-clause-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review IP clauses in a contract for assignment and ownership gaps?

Contract IP checks analyze assignment mechanics, license scope, and warranty provisions to identify ownership gaps. The review detects weak assignment language, such as "agrees to assign" instead of "hereby assigns," and flags missing moral rights waivers.

What is the best way to analyze IP warranty and indemnity issues in a vendor agreement?

Analyzing IP warranty and indemnity issues requires cross-clause consistency checks to verify the system works as a whole. This ensures grant, warranty, indemnity, and termination clauses interact correctly without silent allocation decisions.

How do I generate redlines for intellectual property provisions in consulting or SOW agreements?

Generating redlines for IP provisions involves producing a structured, prioritized memo with severity rankings. This memo flags inconsistencies in background versus foreground IP and provides proposed redline fixes with escalation guidance.

Does this contract IP check work for employment and licensing agreements?

This contract IP check applies to employment, consulting, SOW, vendor, and licensing agreements where IP terms are present. It requires loading a configured IP practice profile and checking for assignment gaps first when relevant.

How are flagged IP risks prioritized during a license scope and ownership review?

Flagged IP risks are prioritized through a structured memo with severity ranking and escalation guidance. The review checks cross-clause consistency and produces an approval routing summary without making silent allocation decisions.