ip-clause-review

Review IP provisions in agreements against a configured practice profile.

Updated May 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/yachela/claude-for-legal-ar --skill ip-clause-review-yachela
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ip-clause-review
Source: https://github.com/yachela/claude-for-legal-ar/tree/main/ip-legal/skills/ip-clause-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/yachela/claude-for-legal-ar --skill ip-clause-review-yachela

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Reviewers need a fast, structured way to identify risky or missing IP terms in agreements so they can focus attorney time on the highest-stakes fixes, especially around assignment, ownership, and license scope.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Practice-profile-driven clause review: Compares each IP clause against the configured CLAUDE.md practice profile so findings match the team’s intended posture.
  • Assignment gap and risk-first memo output: Runs an assignment-gap check early (when applicable) and produces a memo with findings prioritized by severity, including suggested redline language where appropriate.
  • Cross-clause consistency and jurisdiction notes: Flags conflicts across clauses (grant vs. warranty vs. indemnity vs. termination) and highlights jurisdiction-sensitive issues such as moral rights and work-for-hire considerations.

Quick Start

Use the ip-clause-review skill to review an IP agreement by providing the agreement text or a file link, and it will return a risk-prioritized memo with per-clause findings and proposed redlines.

Frequently Asked Questions about ip-clause-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review IP clauses in a contract for assignment and ownership gaps?

Reviewing IP clauses for assignment gaps involves assessing ownership transfer, license scope, warranties, and indemnities against a configured practice profile. This generates a risk-prioritized memo with severity scoring and suggested redline language for attorney review.

What is cross-clause consistency checking in intellectual property provisions?

Cross-clause consistency checking in IP provisions identifies conflicts across grant, warranty, indemnity, and termination clauses. It highlights jurisdiction-sensitive issues like moral rights and work-for-hire considerations to ensure agreement terms do not contradict each other.

Can I use automated redline drafting for IP terms in vendor MSAs and SOWs?

Automated redline drafting applies to IP terms in vendor MSAs, SOWs, employment, and consulting agreements. It compares provisions against a practice profile and produces suggested redline language specifically tailored for attorney review.

Does contract review for IP license scope require a specific document format?

Contract review for IP license scope accepts agreement text that is pasted directly, attached as a file, or provided via a path or Drive link. This allows analysis of licensing, employment, and vendor documents without strict formatting constraints.

How do I detect missing intellectual property assignment clauses in consulting agreements?

Detecting missing IP assignment clauses in consulting agreements requires running an assignment-gap check early in the review process. This flags absent or risky ownership transfer terms and prioritizes them by severity in a structured memo.

What jurisdiction notes are generated during IP clause review?

Jurisdiction notes generated during IP clause review highlight jurisdiction-sensitive issues such as moral rights and work-for-hire considerations. These notes are included in a structured memo to flag region-specific legal risks within the agreement.