judge

Review program.md for hypothesis clarity, measurement validity, and control adequacy.

24|3|Updated Feb 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Borda/AI-Rig --skill judge-borda
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: judge
Source: https://github.com/Borda/AI-Rig/tree/main/plugins/research/skills/judge
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Borda/AI-Rig --skill judge-borda

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill provides a structured, automated review workflow to validate experimental methodology, enabling teams to detect design weaknesses before conducting expensive runs.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated program.md evaluation across seven dimensions of methodology, producing a formal verdict and a completeness audit.
  • Supports running steps J1–J6, parallel reviews, and generated run artifacts for reproducibility.
  • Use cases include ML research campaigns, A/B experiments, and codebase experiments requiring rigorous planning.

Quick Start

Run the judge skill against your project by invoking /research:judge path/to/program.md from the project root.

Frequently Asked Questions about judge

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate experimental methodology before running expensive ML research campaigns?

Review experimental design by evaluating program.md against seven methodology dimensions, producing a formal verdict and completeness audit. This agent-assisted workflow assesses hypothesis clarity, measurement validity, and control adequacy before run execution.

What is a structured research review of program.md for software experiments?

A structured research review of program.md is an agent-assisted evaluation that identifies methodological flaws by assessing hypothesis clarity, measurement validity, and control adequacy. It outputs a formal verdict, completeness audit, and methodology report covering goals, metrics, and reproducibility.

Can I use an automated methodology review for A/B experiments and codebase experiments?

Yes, automated methodology review supports ML research campaigns, A/B experiments, and codebase experiments requiring rigorous planning. It evaluates program.md to ensure accurate experimental design across goals, metrics, guards, scope, and reproducibility before run execution.

How do I run a formal methodology report and completeness audit for an AI research campaign?

Run a formal methodology report by invoking the judge workflow against your campaign program. The workflow executes steps J1–J6, performing parallel reviews of program.md to generate a verdict, completeness audit, and reproducibility artifacts for your research campaign.

Do I need a campaign program file to assess hypothesis clarity and measurement validity?

Yes, you need a campaign program.md file to assess hypothesis clarity and measurement validity. The structured review workflow requires access to this program file to evaluate experimental design dimensions and generate the formal methodology report.