kiro-review

Evaluate task implementations against approved requirements and design boundaries.

Updated Apr 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/shimaMatz/driver-copilot --skill kiro-review-shimamatz
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: kiro-review
Source: https://github.com/shimaMatz/driver-copilot/tree/main/.cursor/skills/kiro-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/shimaMatz/driver-copilot --skill kiro-review-shimamatz

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This task-local adversarial review verifies that a completed implementation is real, complete, bounded, and aligned with approved requirements and design, with mechanical verification evidence.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Validates alignment with the approved requirements and design documents.
  • Detects boundary violations, missing components, or design drift before acceptance.
  • Produces a formal decision (APPROVED or REJECTED) with mechanical results, findings (with severity), required remediation, and a concise summary.

Quick Start

Review the prepared diff, run the canonical validation checks, and decide on acceptance based on the evidence.

Frequently Asked Questions about kiro-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a code diff against approved requirements before acceptance?

Task review validates code diff alignment against approved requirements and design documents, detecting boundary violations and design drift. It produces a formal APPROVED or REJECTED decision with mechanical verification evidence and required remediation guidance.

What is spec compliance verification in task governance?

Spec compliance verification is an adversarial review mechanism that checks a completed implementation against approved boundaries and requirements. It enforces mechanical checks and produces explicit remediation guidance to ensure work stays within defined task governance limits.

How do I run mechanical validation checks for task verification?

Run mechanical validation checks by reviewing the prepared diff after READY_FOR_REVIEW or remediation. The process evaluates implementation completeness against approved specifications and generates formal findings with severity levels and a concise acceptance summary.

When do I need to perform an adversarial task review?

Perform an adversarial task review after READY_FOR_REVIEW status, after remediation cycles, or before final acceptance. This timing ensures the implementation is real, complete, bounded, and aligned with approved design documents before integration.

Does boundary violation detection work without approved design documents?

Boundary violation detection requires approved requirements and design documents as reference baselines. Without these specifications, the review cannot detect design drift, missing components, or boundary violations because there are no approved constraints to validate against.

What is the best way to enforce task boundaries during code review?

Enforce task boundaries during code review by applying a task-local adversarial review process that checks implementation against approved requirements. This approach captures boundary violations and missing components with mechanical verification evidence before acceptance.