km:quality-review

What problem does it solve?

This skill systematizes quality reviews of uncommitted changes by mapping diffs to ISO/IEC 25010:2023 quality characteristics, reducing missed security, reliability, performance, and maintainability issues that typically escape functional-focused reviews.

Core Features & Use Cases

• Checklist-driven evaluation: Uses a prioritized quality-checklist to decide depth and scope of review per change type (Full / Focused / Quick).
• Reference-backed judgments: Provides per-characteristic guidance and anti-patterns via a reference directory to reduce false positives and justify findings.
• Structured reporting: Emits a report-format with categorized findings (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW) and a nine-characteristic PASS/WARN/FAIL/SKIP summary to support commit gating and engineering decision-making.
• Use Case: During a feature branch review, run this workflow on the git diff to detect ownership/authorization gaps, N+1 patterns, unsafe input handling, and regression risks before merging.

Quick Start

Run a checklist-based review of the current git diff using the quality-checklist, consult reference files for ambiguous items, and produce a report that summarizes all nine ISO/IEC 25010 characteristics with evidence-backed findings.