What problem does it solve? Graduate students writing Chinese master's or PhD theses in LaTeX face recurring problems: XeLaTeX compilation failures, GB/T 7714 bibliography errors, inconsistent terminology across chapters, weak literature reviews, and prose that reads as AI-generated. This Skill routes each problem to a dedicated diagnostic script and returns review-ready findings without touching citations, labels, or math environments. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Compilation & Template Diagnosis: Builds with XeLaTeX/LuaLaTeX via a safe wrapper, identifies templates such as thuthesis or pkuthss, and reports exact errors with exit codes. - Format & Bibliography Checks: Validates GB/T 7714 references, three-line (booktabs) tables, abstract five-element structure, and chapter/section heading lead-ins. - Logic, Literature & De-AI Review: Detects author-year enumeration in related work, missing research-gap derivation, broken introduction-to-conclusion logic chains, and high-frequency AI-writing phrases with configurable thresholds. - Use Case: A PhD candidate asks why main.tex fails to compile and whether the references follow GB/T 7714; the Skill runs the compile and bibliography modules in sequence and returns line-annotated findings in LaTeX comment format. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to diagnose your Chinese thesis project, for example: check why main.tex fails to compile with XeLaTeX and verify the references against GB/T 7714.
