What problem does it solve? Legal briefs and court filings often fail because they ignore how judges actually process information, and pro se or neurodivergent litigants face additional credibility bias that strong written advocacy can counteract. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Evidence-Based Persuasion Framework: Applies judicial cognition research (anchoring, coherence-based reasoning, fluency effects) and empirical findings like the 85% win rate for more readable briefs. - Elite Advocate Techniques: Distills methods from Roberts, Clement, Kagan, and Garner including point-first structure, 75-word deep issue statements, inoculation against counterarguments, and narrative statement of facts. - Structural Templates and Checklists: Provides a complete brief structure template, a 13-point writing checklist, oral argument guidance, and pro se credibility strategies. - Use Case: A pro se defendant opposing a motion to dismiss uses the skill to draft an opposition brief with a roadmap paragraph, persuasive point headings, a narrative statement of facts, and preemptive refutation of the plaintiff's strongest argument. ## Quick Start Use the legal-brief-writing skill to draft an opposition brief to a motion for summary judgment with a deep issue statement and point-first argument structure.
