legal-escalation-router

Routes legal questions and proposed actions to attorneys, CPAs, or HR professionals using a 13-trigger escalation framework.

Updated Aug 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/fritzgeraldz/Vibe-Managing --skill legal-escalation-router-fritzgeraldz
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: legal-escalation-router
Source: https://github.com/fritzgeraldz/Vibe-Managing/tree/main/skills/legal/legal-escalation-router
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/fritzgeraldz/Vibe-Managing --skill legal-escalation-router-fritzgeraldz

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Founders constantly face legal-flavored questions and proposed actions with legal, tax, IP, or employment dimensions, but answering them without a qualified professional creates liability. This Skill acts as a gatekeeper that decides whether a matter requires counsel and packages it so the professional meeting is fast and inexpensive, while never generating anything that reads as legal advice. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Trigger-Based Escalation: Matches any matter against 13 legal escalation triggers (contracts, entity changes, restrictive covenants, hiring/firing, discrimination, IP theft, litigation, tax, and more) to produce a verdict of escalate_required, escalate_recommended, or no_trigger. - Framed Escalation Packages: Builds a structured hand-off containing the situation, what is known, the specific decision needed, exposure, reversibility, and deadline so attorneys or CPAs can resolve it with minimal billable back-and-forth. - Action Holds and Urgency Classification: Holds irreversible or urgent actions (demand letters, subpoenas, imminent signings) and explicitly advises the founder not to act before counsel. - Use Case: A founder receives a trademark infringement demand letter with a 10-day deadline and asks for a drafted response. The Skill refuses to draft a legal position, flags triggers #9 and #11, marks the matter urgent, and produces an intake email for the founder to send to IP counsel. ## Quick Start Ask the legal escalation router whether your legal question or proposed action requires an attorney and to frame the question for them.

Frequently Asked Questions about legal-escalation-router

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I know if my business question needs a lawyer?▼

The Skill matches your question or proposed action against 13 escalation triggers covering contracts, entity changes, employment decisions, IP issues, litigation, and tax. If any trigger fires, it returns an escalate_required verdict with a framed question for counsel.

How to route legal questions to an attorney or CPA?▼

Submit the matter with its signals (contract signing, termination, IP claim, tax question, etc.) and the Skill classifies urgency, identifies the right professional target, and builds a structured escalation package with the situation, decision needed, exposure, and deadline.

Does this Skill provide legal advice or draft legal responses?▼

No. It never answers the underlying legal question, drafts a legal position, or authorizes a legal commitment. It only decides who should handle the matter and frames the question so a qualified professional can resolve it.

What happens when a legal matter is urgent like a subpoena or demand letter?▼

Urgent triggers such as litigation, subpoenas, audits, or suspected IP theft produce an immediate escalate_required verdict. The Skill holds the proposed action and explicitly advises the founder not to respond or sign anything before counsel weighs in.

When should I not use a legal escalation router?▼

Do not use it for full contract triage, compliance scans, IP audits, or entity comparisons; run those specialized skills first and they route back at their triggers. It also returns no_trigger when a matter has no legal, tax, IP, or employment dimension.

What if I don't have an attorney or CPA on file?▼

The Skill recommends engaging the appropriate professional before proceeding rather than substituting its own judgment. It still produces the framed escalation package so the first professional meeting is fast and cost-efficient.