What problem does it solve? Law students need honest critique of their memos, briefs, papers, and exam essays, but having an AI rewrite the draft defeats the purpose of writing practice. This Skill reads a full draft and delivers structured feedback on organization, analysis depth, clarity, and citation form while strictly refusing to rewrite any of it. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Structural critique by document type: Identifies whether the draft is an office memo, brief, paper, or exam essay and evaluates it against the conventions of that form (IRAC/CRAC, argument ordering, thesis placement). - Top-down feedback report: Produces a structured review covering structure first, then analysis depth (rule statements, application, counterarguments), then clarity and citation form, ending with the top three prioritized fixes. - Hard no-rewrite guardrail: Refuses rewrite requests gracefully and instead offers targeted structural feedback, a labeled example of a structural move, or a Socratic drill on the underlying rule. - Use Case: A 1L pastes a draft memo and asks for feedback. The Skill reads it end to end, flags that the discussion section recites facts without linking them to the rule, notes passive-voice overuse with specific examples, and lists three prioritized fixes — without writing a single sentence of the memo. ## Quick Start Paste your legal writing draft and ask for structural feedback on its organization, analysis depth, and clarity without any rewriting.
