literature-reviewer

Evaluate drug-repurposing hypotheses by appraising published evidence for compound–target–oral mucositis connections.

4|1|Updated Jan 8, 2024
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/OpenSourcePharmaFoundation/ospf-ayurveda-kg --skill literature-reviewer-opensourcepharmafoundation
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: literature-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/OpenSourcePharmaFoundation/ospf-ayurveda-kg/tree/main/.claude/skills/literature-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/OpenSourcePharmaFoundation/ospf-ayurveda-kg --skill literature-reviewer-opensourcepharmafoundation

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Prevents the knowledge-graph pipeline from promoting drug or phytochemical hypotheses with weak or already-failed evidence by systematically gathering, appraising, and synthesizing literature for compound–target–disease links in oral mucositis (OM).

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Systematic evidence gathering: Searches for direct clinical, mechanistic, and genetic/target relevance for each hypothesis.
  • Evidence-level classification: Assigns an evidence strength tier (from systematic reviews down to in silico and traditional use).
  • Contradiction and negative-result checking: Explicitly looks for failed trials, negative studies, and evidence against the hypothesis before recommending it.
  • Knowledge-gap identification: Highlights what remains untested (e.g., missing target validation in OM-relevant models).

Quick Start

Use the literature-reviewer skill to produce an evidence appraisal for the specific compound–target–oral mucositis hypothesis you want to test.

Frequently Asked Questions about literature-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I systematically validate drug-target hypotheses for oral mucositis?

A literature review for drug repurposing evaluates compound–target–disease connections by applying a structured evidence hierarchy, including clinical, mechanistic, and genetic relevance, to determine whether to advance or reject specific compound candidates in oral mucositis.

What is the best way to check for negative results or failed trials in drug repurposing evidence?

Checking for failed trials and negative studies during evidence appraisal ensures weak or already-failed drug repurposing hypotheses are identified. This prevents the knowledge-graph pipeline from promoting unsupported compound candidates for oral mucositis treatment.

How do I classify evidence strength for a compound-disease relevance assessment?

Classifying evidence strength for compound-disease relevance involves assigning an evidence-level tier ranging from systematic reviews down to in silico and traditional use. This structured hierarchy appraises clinical, mechanistic, and target relevance for each hypothesis.

Can I use systematic search to identify knowledge gaps in oral mucositis target validation?

Yes, a systematic literature search identifies knowledge gaps in oral mucositis target validation by highlighting what remains untested, such as missing target validation in OM-relevant models. This produces an evidence-backed recommendation with a confidence rating.

What are the limitations of literature review for drug repurposing evidence appraisal?

Limitations of literature review for drug repurposing evidence appraisal include reliance on available published sources and the presence of untested knowledge gaps. It synthesizes existing evidence rather than generating new experimental data to produce a confidence rating.