Analyze reasoning texts to detect logical errors, contradictions, and fallacies.
npx skills add https://github.com/vadirn/nix --skill logic-check-vadirn
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: logic-check Source: https://github.com/vadirn/nix/tree/main/home/agents/skills/logic-check Command: npx skills add https://github.com/vadirn/nix --skill logic-check-vadirn
This Skill helps users identify logical errors and fallacies in their reasoning, improving argument clarity and correctness.
Use the logic-check skill to analyze the provided argument text for logical consistency and fallacies.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To check for logical fallacies and reasoning errors, you need an automated analysis tool that evaluates argument structure, identifies unsupported assumptions, and detects contradictions within diverse argumentation styles.
Argument auditing is the process of systematically evaluating the validity and logical soundness of complex arguments. It validates academic writing by detecting unsupported assumptions, contradictions, and fallacious reasoning to ensure argument integrity.
Yes, you can use fallacy detection for legal and persuasive texts. The analysis evaluates argument validity across academic, legal, and professional contexts, ensuring clarity and logical soundness in diverse argumentation styles.
Auditing a complex argument requires providing a detailed logical framework and reference materials. The analysis evaluates the argument structure, detects invalid reasoning, and highlights unsupported assumptions to verify logical consistency.
Yes, you need a detailed logical framework and reference materials to evaluate argument structure and validity. These inputs allow the analysis to accurately identify logical errors, contradictions, and fallacies across different argumentation styles.
Automated reasoning analysis requires a detailed logical framework and reference materials to function properly. It is limited to evaluating the logical structure and validity of provided texts, and cannot generate new arguments or assess external factual accuracy.
ZanderRussEvaluate scientific research methodology, biases, and evidence quality using GRADE and Cochrane ROB frameworks.
wwsunDeconstruct arguments, identify logical fallacies, and assess evidence validity in text.
majesticlabs-devEdit and polish grammar, clarity, and style in business writing.
starlink-awakenDecompose arguments into 24 atomic claims and synthesize steelman and counter-argument critiques.
