What problem does it solve?
Generic AI tools produce non-compliant, unsafe LOPA worksheets that fabricate PFD or SIL values, skip de-identification requirements, or lack engineer verification, leading to rejected safety documentation and regulatory penalties for process safety teams.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Structured Single-Scenario Intake: Enforces one named hazard scenario per worksheet, eliciting engineer-supplied initiating event frequencies, IPL independence tests, and PFD values one question at a time to eliminate vague, non-specific inputs.
- Assistive Compliance Guardrails: Never computes PFD values or allocates SIL targets, marking all unsupplied inputs as [GAP], applies mandatory de-identification of personal/health data, and ranks IPLs against the hierarchy of controls to flag administrative-only protection layers.
- Use Case: A process safety engineer can use this skill to structure a LOPA for a reactor high-pressure scenario, inputting verified IPL PFDs and independence test results to generate a compliant worksheet ready for competent person sign-off, with no fabricated safety values.
Quick Start
Use the lopa-worksheet skill to structure a single-scenario LOPA for your named hazard scenario by providing the engineer-supplied initiating event frequency, IPL independence test results, and PFD values when prompted.