lopa-worksheet

Structure single-scenario LOPA worksheets with engineer-supplied IPL data.

1|Updated Jun 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ashley-eyekyam/hse-leadership-skills --skill lopa-worksheet
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: lopa-worksheet
Source: https://github.com/ashley-eyekyam/hse-leadership-skills/tree/main/skills/lopa-worksheet
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ashley-eyekyam/hse-leadership-skills --skill lopa-worksheet

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Generic AI tools produce non-compliant, unsafe LOPA worksheets that fabricate PFD or SIL values, skip de-identification requirements, or lack engineer verification, leading to rejected safety documentation and regulatory penalties for process safety teams.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured Single-Scenario Intake: Enforces one named hazard scenario per worksheet, eliciting engineer-supplied initiating event frequencies, IPL independence tests, and PFD values one question at a time to eliminate vague, non-specific inputs.
  • Assistive Compliance Guardrails: Never computes PFD values or allocates SIL targets, marking all unsupplied inputs as [GAP], applies mandatory de-identification of personal/health data, and ranks IPLs against the hierarchy of controls to flag administrative-only protection layers.
  • Use Case: A process safety engineer can use this skill to structure a LOPA for a reactor high-pressure scenario, inputting verified IPL PFDs and independence test results to generate a compliant worksheet ready for competent person sign-off, with no fabricated safety values.

Quick Start

Use the lopa-worksheet skill to structure a single-scenario LOPA for your named hazard scenario by providing the engineer-supplied initiating event frequency, IPL independence test results, and PFD values when prompted.

Frequently Asked Questions about lopa-worksheet

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I build a compliant LOPA worksheet per IEC 61511 without fabricating safety values?

To build a compliant LOPA worksheet per IEC 61511, you must supply verified initiating event frequencies, IPL independence tests, and PFD values. The skill structures this data into a single-scenario worksheet, marking any unsupplied inputs as [GAP] to prevent fabricated safety values.

What is the process for structuring a single-scenario Layer of Protection Analysis?

Structuring a single-scenario Layer of Protection Analysis involves defining one named hazard scenario, then providing engineer-verified initiating event frequencies and independent protection layer data. The skill enforces this by eliciting required inputs one question at a time to eliminate vague or non-specific entries.

Does this LOPA worksheet tool calculate PFD values or allocate SIL targets automatically?

No, this LOPA worksheet tool does not calculate PFD values or allocate SIL targets. It enforces assistive discipline by leaving all unsupplied safety values as [GAP], requiring a competent functional safety engineer to supply the data and perform pre-output review.

Can I use generic AI to generate process safety documentation for hazard scenarios?

Generic AI tools often produce non-compliant process safety documentation by skipping de-identification or fabricating safety values. This skill enforces mandatory de-identification of personal data and validates the hierarchy of controls to ensure compliant hazard analysis output.

Do I need a functional safety engineer to review LOPA worksheets before output?

Yes, you need a functional safety engineer for pre-output SME review. The skill requires a LOPA/SIL competent person to verify the worksheet, ensuring the initiating event frequencies, IPL independence tests, and hierarchy of controls validation meet IEC 61511 standards.

When should I flag administrative-only protection layers during hazard analysis?

You should flag administrative-only protection layers during hazard analysis when ranking independent protection layers against the hierarchy of controls. This validation step ensures your LOPA worksheet accurately identifies weaker administrative IPLs within the safety compliance review.