ma-publication-quality

Audit meta-analytic manuscripts for PRISMA 2020 and MOOSE reporting completeness.

115|45|Updated Feb 5, 2026

Search Tags:#qa #prisma #meta-analysis #cross-reference #publication #grade

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/htlin222/meta-pipe --skill ma-publication-quality

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ma-publication-quality
Source: https://github.com/htlin222/meta-pipe/tree/main/ma-publication-quality
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/htlin222/meta-pipe --skill ma-publication-quality

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Publication-quality checks and enhancements for high-impact journal submissions, including PRISMA/MOOSE reporting, robust meta-analysis diagnostics, GRADE SoF, claim audits, and cross-reference validation to ensure reproducibility and journal-ready manuscripts.

Core Features & Use Cases

PRISMA 2020 and MOOSE reporting alignment with manuscript sections and data sources.
Robust diagnostics: Hartung-Knapp, prediction intervals, influence diagnostics, and sensitivity analyses.
GRADE Summary of Findings generation and cross-reference validation for figures/tables.
End-to-end QA workflow from 07_manuscript assets to final QA package, including automated audits.

Quick Start

Run the publication-quality QA pipeline on your project’s 07_manuscript and 06_analysis folders to generate a comprehensive audit package.

Frequently Asked Questions about ma-publication-quality

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I check my manuscript for PRISMA 2020 reporting compliance?▼

Check PRISMA 2020 reporting compliance by auditing manuscript sections against PRISMA and MOOSE checklists to verify alignment with data sources. This ensures reporting completeness and methodological robustness for journal submissions.

What is the best way to validate cross-references in a meta-analysis manuscript?▼

Validate cross-references in a meta-analysis manuscript by enforcing consistency checks between data tables, figures, and manuscript claims. This process ensures reproducibility and verifies that all referenced outputs align with the analytical results.

How do I generate a GRADE Summary of Findings for a systematic review?▼

Generate a GRADE Summary of Findings (SoF) by running an automated QA workflow on your analysis folders to produce the required outputs. This includes cross-reference validation to ensure the SoF tables match the manuscript data.

Does my meta-analysis need Hartung-Knapp and prediction interval diagnostics?▼

Your meta-analysis needs Hartung-Knapp adjustments and prediction intervals to satisfy methodological robustness requirements for high-impact journals. These robust diagnostics are enforced during the QA pipeline to verify result reliability.

Can I run a publication-quality audit on a draft meta-analysis manuscript?▼

You can run a publication-quality audit on manuscripts in stages from draft to final QA package. The pipeline processes your manuscript and analysis folders to identify reporting gaps and methodological issues at any stage.

What should a final QA package for a meta-analysis submission include?▼

A final QA package for a meta-analysis submission should include PRISMA 2020 and MOOSE checklists, GRADE SoF outputs, robust diagnostics, and cross-reference validations. This comprehensive audit ensures a journal-ready manuscript.