manuscript-review

Generate structured peer-review feedback for scientific manuscripts across five sections.

Updated Jan 13, 2026

Search Tags:#methodology #ethics #statistics #reproducibility #peer-review #manuscript-review

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/MrGKanev/agent-skills --skill manuscript-review

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: manuscript-review
Source: https://github.com/MrGKanev/agent-skills/tree/main/my-skills/manuscript-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/MrGKanev/agent-skills --skill manuscript-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill provides a structured, scalable peer-review framework to evaluate scientific manuscripts for rigor, transparency, and scholarly quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

Phase-based Evaluation: Structured checks for Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion, with emphasis on methodology, statistics, reproducibility, and ethics.
Feedback Template: Generates hierarchical feedback with a Summary, Major Comments, Minor Comments, and Questions for Authors.
Discipline-Agnostic Guidance: Adaptable to clinical, computational, and theoretical research across disciplines.

Quick Start

Provide the manuscript text or upload the manuscript and request a "manuscript review" focusing on methodology, statistics, reproducibility, and clarity.

Frequently Asked Questions about manuscript-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I automate peer review for a scientific manuscript?▼

To automate peer review for a scientific manuscript, provide the text or upload the document and request a review. The skill evaluates methodology, statistics, reproducibility, and ethics across standard sections to generate structured feedback.

What is structured manuscript peer review and how does it work?▼

Structured manuscript peer review is a phase-based evaluation of scientific papers across Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion. It checks methodological rigor and ethics, producing a hierarchical critique with summaries, major comments, minor comments, and questions for authors.

Can I use this manuscript review skill for computational and theoretical research?▼

Yes, you can use this manuscript review skill for computational and theoretical research. It offers discipline-agnostic guidance that adapts to clinical, computational, and theoretical disciplines to evaluate scholarly quality and transparency.

How do I check reproducibility and statistics in a scientific paper?▼

To check reproducibility and statistics in a scientific paper, run a structured manuscript review. The evaluation specifically targets statistical rigor and reproducibility during the Methods and Results phase checks to identify transparency issues.

What is the best way to generate peer review comments for authors?▼

The best way to generate peer review comments for authors is using a structured feedback template. It automatically categorizes critiques into a Summary, Major Comments, Minor Comments, and targeted Questions for Authors based on phase-based evaluations.

Does automated manuscript review cover research ethics and methodological rigor?▼

Yes, automated manuscript review covers research ethics and methodological rigor. The framework includes specific checks for these elements during the phase-based evaluation of the Methods and Discussion sections to ensure scholarly quality.