marketing-claims-review

To review marketing claims for legal risk, paste your promotional copy into the tool. It extracts and classifies each claim, checks it against marketing claims standards, and outputs a structured claim-by-claim remediation plan to determine publication readiness.

In advertising review, puffery is subjective promotional language, while factual claims require substantiation. The tool classifies extracted marketing text into categories like puffery, specific factual, comparative, implied, or absolute to identify which statements need evidence.

You can check if your marketing copy needs substantiation by running a review. The tool flags which non-puffery claims require substantiation, identifies missing evidence, and suggests reframing to reduce legal risk before publication.

Yes, you can use this to review comparative advertising and misleading statements. It evaluates marketing text from landing pages, emails, and ads, extracting claims and flagging potentially misleading statements that require reframing or removal.

Marketing claims review works for landing pages, emails, ads, and other promotional assets. You simply paste the marketing text you want reviewed, and it applies a policy-anchored workflow to extract claims and output a structured remediation checklist.

Automated marketing copy legal review enforces a no silent supplement approach when research coverage is thin. It produces a readiness determination based on configured role guidance, but requires configured marketing claims standards to anchor its policy-anchored workflow.