marketing-claims-review

Extract and categorize marketing claims into specific factual, comparative, implied, or absolute types.

Updated May 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/gtgspot/clegal --skill marketing-claims-review-gtgspot
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: marketing-claims-review
Source: https://github.com/gtgspot/clegal/tree/main/product-legal/skills/marketing-claims-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/gtgspot/clegal --skill marketing-claims-review-gtgspot

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps legal and marketing teams identify unsubstantiated or potentially misleading claims in marketing copy, classify them, and guide rewrites to meet substantiation standards and regulatory requirements.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Claim extraction: Identify every factual, comparative, implied, or absolute claim in the asset.
  • Claim classification: Tag claims as specific factual, comparative, implied, or absolute to guide risk assessment.
  • Substantiation guidance: Outline data required to substantiate each claim and flag gaps.
  • Attorney-ready outputs: Produce a claim-by-claim report with suggested rewrites and references for review.
  • Use Case: A team reviews a landing page to verify that every claim is substantiated before publication.

Quick Start

Paste your marketing copy into the tool and run the review to generate a claim-by-claim report.

Frequently Asked Questions about marketing-claims-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review marketing copy for unsubstantiated claims and compliance risks?

To review marketing copy for compliance risks, paste the asset text into the tool to automatically extract and classify every factual, comparative, implied, or absolute claim. It generates a claim-by-claim report flagging disallowed statements and mapping required substantiation data for attorney review.

What is the best way to identify and categorize comparative or absolute claims in advertising copy?

Identifying and categorizing comparative or absolute claims in advertising copy is done by extracting all statements and tagging them by type. The tool assesses each tag against jurisdictional advertising standards to flag disallowed comparative or absolute statements for attorney review.

How do I check if my landing page claims meet advertising substantiation requirements?

To check if landing page claims meet substantiation requirements, the tool applies jurisdictional advertising standards to each extracted claim. It outputs a report mapping every claim to required data types and identifying existing gaps in evidence.

Can I get suggested rewrites for misleading marketing claims to ensure legal compliance?

Yes, you can get suggested rewrites for misleading marketing claims to ensure legal compliance. The generated claim-by-claim report includes recommended rewrites for each flagged statement alongside its required substantiation needs.

What types of marketing claims require attorney review before publication?

Marketing claims that require attorney review before publication include any disallowed comparative or absolute statements flagged during the assessment. The tool identifies these specific high-risk claims and maps the evidence gaps needed for final legal sign-off.

Does this tool work for any text asset or only specific advertising formats?

This tool works for any text asset where marketing copy is present, such as a landing page or promotional text. You simply paste the provided copy into the tool to run the review and generate the report regardless of the original format.